Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)
    Skip to top
    Skip to bottom


    April 26[edit]

    Update template dates?[edit]

    I see some people (mostly IPs) update maintenance template(like npv dispute, unreferenced) dates to current month. I think it is wrong as the dates are to measure how long the problem has been there. Am I correct? ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 07:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @ExclusiveEditor: Yes. Please feel free to revert such edits (bit do not edit war); and ask them to desist on their talk pages. You may report persistent offenders to WP:ANI.
    Note that this does not apply to templates like {{Use British English}}, {{Use American English}}, {{Use dmy dates}}, {{Use mdy dates}}, etc. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I accidently removed the photo in the info box, please return if you are able. Thank you in advance 144.130.154.129 (talk) 08:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done   Maproom (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sidebar[edit]

    I would like to add a sidebar like the one shown on the right on this page: Valentine Ackland to the webpage that I created here: John Craske

    How can I add this fetaure? I have tried searching FAQs but have not found an answer. I have an image ready to go. Thank you CarolynCo (talk) 09:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @CarolynCo: That's an infobox. I see you have now added one. Thank you for your contributions! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Rishishwar Society information[edit]

    Not a request for help

    ऋषिस्वर ब्राह्मण की उत्पत्ति के बारे में किसी को भी प्रमाण सहित जानकारी प्राप्त नहीं है कुछ व्यक्तियों द्वारा पटियाओ द्वारा दी गई वंशावली के आधार पर ऋषिस्वर ब्राह्मणों को द्रविड़ ब्राह्मण माना है! द्रविड़ ब्राह्मण शिव उपासक होते हैं त्रिपुंड धारी  होते हैं। यह आदि गौड़ ब्राह्मण से अलग होते हैं वशिष्ठ आदि गौड़ ब्राह्मणों से इनका कोई लेना-देना नहीं है ऋषिस्वर ब्राह्मण मुख्यतः है ग्वालियर मुरैना भिंड उज्जैन इंदौर जामगढ़ छिंदवाड़ा सागर विदिशा झाबुआ इटावा उन्नाव सफीपुर कानपुर में मुख्यतः निवास करते हैं। Abhishek indore Dixit (talk) 09:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This is the English Wikipedia, please communicate in English. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Google translation:

    No one has any proof of the origin of Rishiswar Brahmins. Some people have considered Rishiswar Brahmins as Dravidian Brahmins on the basis of the genealogy given by the Patias. Dravidian Brahmins are Shiva worshippers and wear Tripund. They are different from Adi Gaud Brahmins. They have nothing to do with Vashishtha and other Gaud Brahmins. Rishiswar Brahmins mainly reside in Gwalior, Morena, Bhind, Ujjain, Indore, Jamgarh, Chhindwara, Sagar, Vidisha, Jhabua, Etawah, Unnao, Safipur, Kanpur.

    That's a polemic, not a request for help editing Wikipedia. Collapsing. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Can i add Social Media platform names etymology in Wikipedia page- List of company name etymologies?[edit]

    That Wikipedia page is about company name etymology, is it ok to add Social platform name etymologies in this page because YouTube, WhatsApp, Line work as companies? Octo2k (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I would think so - provided you cite reliable sources for the etymology. Beware of random people making things up, or speculating about things nobody knows. (Yes, I know there's plenty of entries there without citations. There shouldn't be. I've tagged it as needing more). ColinFine (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, now I've looked at it, I cannot understand why that article should exist, and I have opened a discussion on the artcile's talk page. ColinFine (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that article should exist because etymology is an important thing to know about a particular thing, in that Wikipedia page people can find companies name etymology just by using find in page feature through web browser. Octo2k (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Octo2k, there's a difference between importance and notability - you may want to read this page, specifically the bits down here. 57.140.16.48 (talk) 15:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Octo2k, the trouble is that that list is full of surmise and guess. It might be right in many cases, but without a citation to check, it is worthless - and I think it's likely that in many cases no authoritative statement will be found.
    In cases where it is interesting - and documented - it should be in the article about the company: there is no value in collecting this list: see WP:INDISCRIMINATE.
    I have therefore nominated it for deletion, at WP:Articles for deletion/List of company name etymologies. This opens a discussion which anybody may contribute to, and it is possible that people will come up with reasons to keep it according to Wikipedia's policies. You are as welcome as anybody else to contribute to that discussion - but I suggest you read WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, especially USEFUL, first. ColinFine (talk) 16:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have checked in some etymologies there are citation, but in some there no citations have used. Octo2k (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Referencing errors on St. George, Louisiana[edit]

    Reference help requested. How do i fix it?

    Thanks, Endisnear (talk) 18:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, Endisnear. When you use a citation template with a "title" field, then you must provide the title or the tempate generates an error message. Just add the title. Cullen328 (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    thank you. i just mimmicked another one and fixed it! Endisnear (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How can user not form the same country whitewash TV pages from different country[edit]

    Non British users have claimed "And There's More" as non notable series and just got rid, didnt EVEN Try to move the content just thought who care, It become Clear far too often users are lazy and just white wash stuff. I dread to think what other pages get this treatment and what details coudl be lost.

    Crazyseiko (talk) 22:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't really know why you'd think that this is a "country whitewash". The WP:BURDEN is on article creators to sufficiently show that something meets our notability guidelines. I can't really comment on this, I'm not familiar with the show, but that pre-redirect was completely unsourced. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 22:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Crazyseiko, an editor does not need to be British to instantly see that the article was entirely unreferenced and therefore completely inappropriate for this encyclopedia without dramatic improvement. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, as long as their edits comply with policies and guidelines. That article did not comply. We have no policy and no guideline that says only British people can edit British topics or only Vietnamese people can edit Vietnamese topics or only Egyptian people can edit Egyptian topics. I happen to be American, and if you happen to make any policy compliant edits to any article about an American topic, I will be very happy to see it. Cullen328 (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And there's no need to copy the entire non-notable redirected article to the talk page of the target [1] Meters (talk) 06:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    CrazyseikoWe mention this show in the article. If you feel there is additional content from that redirected article that should be included then source it and add it. Meters (talk) 06:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Protecting ILLs that need to remain ILLs[edit]

    Short of translating the foreign-language article, is there a template or something for this? I just saw a bot edit an article to say that a football player was the ruler of Algiers in 1724. Because there can only ever be one Ali Abdi, right? That particular instance has been dealt with now, but I had previously noted that the Amour Mountains are a geological feature on en-wiki but a tribal community that produces rugs on fr-wiki, and that linking to the French article was getting tagged as a CS1 error. Just wondering if there is some preventative template like nowrap. Elinruby (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Elinruby, I have been editing Wikipedia for almost 15 years and I had no idea what the acronym "ILL" meant until I wracked my brain and now assume that you probably mean "interlanguage links". Does the French Wikipedia really say that a mountain range weaves rugs? Since you speak French, I believe, I hope that you corrected that. As for Ali Abdi, that is a disambiguation page, but none of the entries correspond to an 18th century Algerian leader. So, to be frank, I am confused by your post, and am hoping that you can perhaps simplify for simple people like me. Cullen328 (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cullen328: sorry sir. It comes up a lot in the topics I edit and I assumed. So now that we have cleared that up:
    1. The mountain range is both articles, but the English article fails to mention that people some Arabic tribal people live there and weave rugs. Compare Amour Range and fr: Djebel Amour. The latter is in French of course, but note the image of the rug, which has a file description in English. This is not fixable by me, because I cannot confidently put a sentence together about the Amour people, other than to say that they make rugs. Which is what I wanted to say at Regency of Algiers. I think I have sufficiently tweaked the wording to avoid this particular problem there. but I had to use passive voice.
    2. Ali Abdi was indeed Dey of Algiers in 1725, I assure you. per multiple sources. It turns out that "Ali Abdi" is also a dab page at fr-wiki, and his article there is fr:Baba Abdi, so there was an error in the article to begin with -- names of individuals are very variable in the topic area -- but here is my question:

    is there a template that could be used to prevent stuff like this.

    As in, yes there is an English-language article with this title, and no, we should not link to it That is what I meant with the analogy to nowrap. As for the link to the correct French article, I am yes about to go fix that again, but I had to track it down. There are several naming and linking problems on the talk page, you may notice. One thing at a time though. Is there such a template? Elinruby (talk) 06:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Elinruby, the older I get, the more I realize how much I do not know. When I search online for "Amour rugs", I find one specific commercial rug marketing company using that term, but not others and nothing more in Google Books, for example. I may well be missing something. Is the term possibly rendered differently in English among rug experts? The search results are flooded with the common French word "amour", of course, and also Old West works by Louis L'Amour, who apparently discussed rugs several times in his 89 novels. As for the bot problem, I see that you are already discussing the issue at User talk:Kanashimi, who operates the bot. I still lack a clear understanding of what function the template you are looking for would actually carry out, so maybe another editor may have some ideas for you. Sorry that I cannot be of greater assistance. Cullen328 (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think all the sources on the rugs are in Arabic, Cullen. Or possibly Berber. That's why I can't just translate my way out of this. But maybe if I ask the question without specifics, because the bot per se is not the problem:
    The problem arises when the English article with the same title is not about the same thing or is less complete.
    People really really want to link to the English article without considering whether it is correct or complete. Not linking to it is considered an error that gets "fixed". If you don't know of such a template, ok. Thanks for listening. I was just trying to find a more elegant solution that isn't ad hoc.Elinruby (talk) 07:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Have you tried contacting kanashimi the operator of Cewbot that made the erroneous edit? [add]Sorry, I missed the mention above that there is discussion at User talk:Kanashimi#Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link. Regarding the rugs, that doesn't seem to be an issue with {{ill}} usage at all, just different amounts of information in the different language wikis. Nothing to be done there other than to translate/import the useful information. olderwiser 11:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Elinruby: It was yourself who made the Ali Abdi error by changing an unlinked Ali Abdi to {{ILL|Ali Abdi|fr}}.[2] Your code claims it's the person in fr:Ali Abdi and that's Ali Abdi (footballer) so the bot had good reason to link our own article about that Ali Abdi. I haven't examined your other case. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (ec) Hi PrimeHunter, nice to meet you too. It is always nice when someone comes along to run wikiblame. I know I have already said somewhere that it could have been me so.. can we deal with the actual question? You're sounding like you need a break from the help desk. I say this as someone who burned out on tech support myself a while back. Now. The Ali Abdi link is fixed. I said in at least one of the other three or four times I have explained this tonight that I might well have been the person who linked to Ali Abdi instead of Baba Ali or... I think the other name of this person is Kur Ali. There is a long list of other such naming problems on the article talk page. but the Ali Abdi in question is not currently a football player in Tunisia since he was putting down a mutiny in Algiers in the early 18th century. I hope you don't talk to newbies like that, PrimeHunter.

    @Bkonrad: thanks for the courteous suggestion. That is the traditional solution to this, yes. I was looking for something else because I do not trust the French article and if I translate it I have to vouch for it. And I don't speak Arabic. So ad hoc solutions it is, then. I guess. And ya, kanashimi and I have spoken and that may lead somewhere, but the bot is merely the symptom of the problem, which is the underlying assumption that the English article is correct and complete. There are many bots, sigh. Thank you all for your input, but apparently the answer is no, there is no software solution to this. Go ahead and close the post; I will go another route on this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elinruby (talkcontribs) 12:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    You didn't say here that it could have been you but I now see you said it at User talk:Kanashimi#Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link. I'm not sure what you mean by "the actual question". If you mean whether there is a way to tell bots to not link the subject an {{ILL}} link like {{ILL|Ali Abdi|fr}} says it's about then I don't think it's possible or should be possible. The whole purpose of using the template is to link an English article if it exists. And it's not realistic to get a bot to analyze fr:Ali Abdi and guess from the context that somebody tried to link the wrong person. You can maybe avoid bots by not using the template at all. Help:Interlanguage links#Inline links (links in the text of the article) gives several variations with links like fr:Ali Abdi (note the colon in front of the wikitext [[:fr:Ali Abdi]]). However, it would link the footballer, just in the French Wikipedia, and Help:Interlanguage links#Inline links (links in the text of the article) says "The best practice is to use the template". If you want to use {{ILL}} to link fr:Baba Abdi but display "Ali Abdi" without linking an English article until one is created about the right person then you have to suggest a name for a future article, and that name will be linked. Using the disambiguator in Haji Ali (Dey of Algiers): {{ILL|Ali Abdi (Dey of Algiers)|lt=Ali Abdi|fr|Baba Abdi}} produces Ali Abdi [fr]. There is no guarantee that a future article will actually get that name or be linked if it's created by somebody who didn't see your link. I haven't examined whether the common name in English sources is Ali Abdi, Baba Abdi or something else, and an "Ali Abdi" title might use another disambiguator or a longer name like Ali Abdi Pasha. Special:WhatLinksHere/Baba Abdi shows three links (I think at least one of them by you) so maybe the simple {{ILL|Baba Abdi|fr}} to produce Baba Abdi [fr] is OK. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Elinruby: PrimeHunter's reply to you was both correct and polite. It is comments like "You're sounding like you need a break from the help desk" that are not acceptable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    His follow-up was good, I will give him that. Elinruby (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think I would be quick to take offense about the suggestion to take a break from the help desk. I am grateful there are people willing to perform such tasks, and if they do something less than perfectly that's okay. By the same token, there are going to be times when somebody may believe you haven't provided the perfect answer, and as long as they're not truly uncivil about it, that should be okay too, whether or not it's factually justified. Fabrickator (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    not what happened here but fine. He started from fingerpointing nad self-corrected. I did tech support for more than ten years. I am sympathetic to burnout. I also would have been fired or at least counseled for talking to a user that way. If this isn't going to get closed I will go ahead and unsubscribe. I found what I was looking for after a fresh dive into the documentation, and the lt parameter is also worth another look as PH suggested in his second answer. I am not a new user so no harm was done. Elinruby (talk) 21:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    April 27[edit]

    Selected reviews on Peter Cusack (musician) article[edit]

    I have noticed that the Peter Cusack (musician) article includes a section that is nothing but quotes from reviews about his albums. Is this, for the lack of a better word, allowed? I have not seen such a thing on articles for other musicians. Still-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Butter (talk) 00:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Removed per WP:UNDUE. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    account deletion[edit]

    hi hi how are you everyone i've done a renamed user like a year ago and i want to like delete my account cuz i just did one edit and i dont see myself using a wikipedia account like ever again yeah Renamed user l3x1w45nth3r3l0lll (talk) 00:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Renamed user l3x1w45nth3r3l0lll due to attribution reasons, accounts on Wikipedia can't be deleted. Just stop using this account. Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 01:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    oh okay Renamed user l3x1w45nth3r3l0lll (talk) 02:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Editing and Mentor[edit]

    I am a new user of wikipedia with a new account. I made some edits and wanted to ask the mentor I was assigned a question but my question does not go through. It says only established editors can ask questions. So my question is this

    Hello.  I made edits to a page - David G Smith - on April 16, 2024 at 23:39.  How will I know if these edits are published? Thanks. Sharon Maroney (talk) 00:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    According to the edit history of David G. Smith (musician), you made edits but they were removed as overly promotional. 331dot (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sharon Maroney: Do you refer to a mentor name you see at Special:Homepage? What is the name? Try contacting the mentor again when you have made at least one more edit. The next will be your tenth edit, making your account autoconfirmed. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank You. Sharon Maroney (talk) 14:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank You for your quick and clear info. I'm learning. Sharon Maroney (talk) 14:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you[edit]

    Thank you to everyone who works on making Wikipedia a wonderful website full of useful and fun information! I hope you all are having a good day. 2601:40:C87F:AF95:0:0:0:C0 (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    General question[edit]

    Hello,

    I was wondering, can a graphic designer be eligible for a article who had win a award plaque on here cause LuckyDesigns, who had won a Official Charts award cause he recently won a UK R&B Singles and Albums Charts Number 1 award section for his work on Do Not Disturb by Nemzzz. Or is there more to be needed for it?. 2601:201:8000:5BB0:512E:ABE4:CC65:AC71 (talk) 06:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello. That depends entirely on whether or not multiple reliable, independent published sources devoted significant coverage to this graphic designer. Please read and study Your first article. We certainly have some articles about people who contribute to musical album photography and graphic design, but multiple independent reliable sources devoting independent coverage are required. I personally worked on one such article, Ethan Russell. Please note, that article has 14 references. Cullen328 (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Referencing errors on Southern Kaduna genocide[edit]

    Reference help requested. Hi @Qwerfjkl. I need your help to detect the error location and correct it. Thanks, Kambai Akau (talk) 07:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, Kambai Akau. The March 29 edit you linked to used a citation template that requires a title, but the title field was left blank. If no title is given, the template produces an error message. The problem must have been corrected in the interim, because I do not see the error message in the current version of the article. Cullen328 (talk) 07:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @Cullen328. I wonder what was in my mind at the moment to have made the error in the initial instance. All the same, warm regards. Kambai Akau (talk) 08:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Kambai Akau, every single Wikipedia editor makes occasional errors, and this was a fairly minor one. Warm regards to you as well. Cullen328 (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @Cullen328. Kambai Akau (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Help with 64.189.18.35[edit]

    Hello, 64.189.18.35 is making a huge number of edits all of a sudden. A good number of them seem above board and helpful (which is why I am coming here and not ANI, AIV, or SPI). The user is eliminating a large of red links, so I left a message about the red links guidelines. The user has deleted content from North African campaign, twice claiming no source. See here 1. However there is material that is clearly sourced to books. I am worried that the user might not understand when books are being sourced. Rather than attempting to help improve articles, the user prefers to remove content. Which is kind of fine, but sometimes unconstructive.

    I also worry about a sock, but can not point to anything definitive yet. Asking for help reviewing their contributions and kindly asking the user to be a little more constructive if you think it is warranted. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the message, @Classicwiki. Taking out sources completely and not improving on them is really bad. In that case, I will ask the user to be more constructive about editing sources of reference and not go about deleting them completely without providing a solution. Much appreciated! Kambai Akau (talk) 07:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kambai Akau - Thanks! I did end up reporting to AIV, but have mixed feelings about it. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Classicwiki, hopefully something would be done on the editor's approach if not now, subsequently. Warm regards. Kambai Akau (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kambai Akau - AIV admin is recommending ANI, but I do not have the energy to keep following this. So I am going to hope others help out if there are still problems. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 08:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Lol. Cool decision. It could be quite a lengthy conversation requiring a great deal of time investment. Kambai Akau (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Transcluded section[edit]

    How do you fix cite error duplicate reference names when you have a section transcluded from another article, as seen here in 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification. I'm flummoxed. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Isaidnoway: A reference with the same name is transcluded from multiple articles. That's tricky. I used Special:ExpandTemplates on the whole 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification to search for "soccer365". I found one definition with slightly different text and changed it.[3] It easily breaks again if anyone changes anything in one of the many definitions. A more stable fix would be to only define the reference in a template and then transclude the template in all the articles. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PrimeHunter, thank you for your assistance. I'm curious, would have changing the ref name in the other article also fixed the duplicate reference name issue? Isaidnoway (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Isaidnoway: Yes, but the article would get two separate references with identical content (except for a non-displayed extra space). We prefer to avoid that. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Server issue[edit]

    Often while I am editing I get a notification when I switch between visual and source editing as "The server did not respond within the expected time.". And my edits are getting erased while switching. Pagers (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, Pagers. Unless other people are reporting this as well, it is likely to be your device or your network with the problem. If others have reported it, you'll probably find them at WP:VPT. ColinFine (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Neil Sean[edit]

    All of the information included on my bio page which I did not instruct myself is detrimental to the one I wish to put up. The information is totally incorrect in every single facet and is now causing a problem to my business of which if not removed will prove very damaging and I will be looking to towards your company as to why this has been allowed to be made public, please remove 194.6.254.76 (talk) 10:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Assuming you are Neil Sean, the content of the article about you (which is not owned by you) depends on what reliable sources have published about you and not on what you want it to say. As you are the article's subject, you have a conflict of interest and should not edit it yourself. You may suggest edits to the article at Talk:Neil Sean. Rummskartoffel 10:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll just add this link which basically says the same thing: Wikipedia:Contact us/Article subjects.  —Smalljim  10:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If you really mean "The information is totally incorrect in every single facet" then the article must be about somebody else. I see you changed the names of Neil Sean's parents.[4] His own book says "Alan Scott and Ann Montini (my mother and father)".[5] That's the names in our article. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have started a discussion at Talk:Neil Sean#NPOV. TSventon (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This is an obvious troll and should not be entertained per my comments on the talk page.--Launchballer 13:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Is there anyone here who can review my page?[edit]

    Anyone? Lennox Levine (talk) 10:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Lennox Levine: Which page? Most of your work has been on Template:Coal. Do you mean that? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I'm the author of Coal sidebar, same topic but different categories! It was reviewed and cleared yesterday. Lennox Levine (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Australian Musicals[edit]

    The 1982 Australian Musical "Starstruck" is not in your list of Australian musicals. 211.30.22.100 (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I don't know how to add it to the list, or even if that is still possible, or I would add it myself, If someone could add it, that would be great. It stars 'Jo Kennedy' and is rather hard to find since a Disney musical of the same name has been released. 211.30.22.100 (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems to me that it's the article Starstruck (1982 film). LightNightLights (talkcontribs) 13:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please give the exact title or URL of any page you want help with. There is no page called "Australian Musicals" or "List of Australian musicals". If you refer to Category:Australian musical films then Starstruck (1982 film) is in the subcategory Category:Australian musical comedy-drama films. We don't usually list a film in both a subcategory and its parent category. If you refer to Category:Australian musicals then it's for stage musicals and not films. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Which links should be included in politician's wikiboxes?[edit]

    I noticed that some of them have just their official government website, some have just their personal campaign site, while other have both their official government website and their personal campaign site.

    Which of these combinations is preferable? Thank you. CGP05 (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, CGP05. At the end of the External links guideline, you will find note "h", which says Situations in which multiple official links are typically provided include: The biography of an elected official might link to both an official government website and the official's political party or campaign website (see, e.g., Barack Obama, Narendra Modi). Cullen328 (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you! CGP05 pr(talk) 18:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course, Barack Obama is no longer an elected official, but the general principle still applies. Cullen328 (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Meant to keep new page as draft, but inadvertently caused it to go live[edit]

    I thought I was drafting the new page "Peter Hruschka", with the intention of several more drafts before submitting it for review. But somehow it has gone live. Is there a way to convert it to draft? Camdenmaine (talk) 13:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Camdenmaine: As seen with the "Draft" prefix in Draft:Peter Hruschka, your draft is still in draftspace. Drafts are public, even when they haven't made it onto mainspace yet. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tenryuu, the page was in mainspace when Camdenmaine asked, but was then moved to draftspace two minutes later. TSventon (talk) 14:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    trout Self-trout. Ah, thanks for clearing that up. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How to transfer a User:Name page to a normal Wikipedia page[edit]

    I would like to get rid of the user: in front of my webpage, User:Langekuettner

    How can I do this? Langekuettner (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Langekuettner: I have moved the page to User:Langekuettner/Sandbox. Please read WP:Autobiography, WP:V and WP:N. If or when you think the page meets the criteria set out on those pages, you may submit it for review using the process described at WP:AFC. Please note that it currently does not, as it cites a lot of your own publications, but no reliable, independent sources about you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Your user page is intended as a place for the named person to tell about themselves as a Wikipedia user; the sandbox is where drafts can be developed. 331dot (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Help with wikidata item[edit]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



    I was trying to link the various pages of pepper (Capsicum) from rowiki with its counterparts in enwiki. But I messed up the Capsicum annuum interlanguage links instead. Can somebody help me undo my mess? Please and thanks! ♦ WikiUser70176 ♦(My talk page) 15:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey, @WikiUser70176, ask only in one place, to keep multiple editors from answering. Valereee (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    References in lists of publications[edit]

    I sometimes see articles with a list of publications (or bibliography, further reading etc.) that include a reference to the listed publication. For example:

    • Jane Doe (1908), Publication Title[1]

    References

    1. ^ Jane Doe (1908), Publication Title

    There's nothing wrong with this, but it seems redundant. Is there a guideline or essay addressing or discouraging the practice? 76.14.122.5 (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes. As with many other things, Wikipedia supports different standards or approaches, and does not call for consistency except within an article. See WP:CITESTYLE. ColinFine (talk) 18:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is usually something extra in the reference like a publisher, ISBN number or external link. Do you have a real example? PrimeHunter (talk) 20:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How to figure out what image to include on a Wikipedia page?[edit]

    Hi, I want to include a picture of Mia Mulder to her Wikipedia page. I looked for images on Wikimedia but I wasn't able to find any. Online, there are a lot of photos from user-generated content sites. Are these allowed to be uploaded, or should I find an "official" image? Where can I upload images? pauliesnug (message / contribs) 21:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, Pauliesnug. Any image you add must be either freely licensed or in the public domain. The vast majority of random images you find online are copyright restricted and therefore cannot be used to illustrate the biography of a living person on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 01:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How long can lists be?[edit]

    Hello! In the process of de-orphaning articles, I came across the article of an Indian village named Dhankoli. After some searching, I found its takula(seems to be Indian city/county equivalent of Western culture) of Dapoli. I went through the process of merging a stub duplicate article to Dapoli, but here's my question: Since there are many villages in Dakoli, would it be appropriate to add a list to the Dapoli article or make a list article( e.g "List of villages in Dapoli"), or would the list be too long?

    Thanks, PolarClimates (talk) 23:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, PolarClimates. Lists are a type of article and the relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Article size. Guidance on how to split up lists can be found at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (lists). Cullen328 (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#List size says lists should be as short as feasible, if that helps. TSventon (talk) 01:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    April 28[edit]

    Please repair reference number 7 - it is all in red. I cannot do this. Thank you Srbernadette (talk) 02:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Srbernadette: You are missing the journal parameter, which the error message says is required for {{Cite Journal}}. If you add journal=Journal of Education to the citation it should fix it. RudolfRed (talk) 02:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please can you fix it - I tried but got it wrong. Also, can you move the file photo of the church interior to the right hand side of the article/page - it is where it should be I think. Thank you and sorry Srbernadette (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Srbernadette: The Help Desk is for helping editors learn how to use Wikipedia, not to perpetually clean up your errors. Please stop editing articles until you are able to fix your errors. You have been given instructions many times. Use your sandbox to practice RudolfRed (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reference number 6 is in the "red". I cannot fix it. please assist if you can. Thank you Srbernadette (talk) 06:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Srbernadette, reference number 6 is provided to back up the following: In 1866, his daughter Jane Dorothea Bloxam (died 1921) married Sir Henry Hanson Berney, 9th Bart. (died 1907). Sir Henry and Lady Berney's grandson was cricketer Cecil Middleton, son of Henry Middleton who, in April 1900, reportedly witnessed at Filey Brigg the drowning of his first cousin Margaret Middleton. Margaret's sister Gertrude and their cousin Henry Middleton were both students at Oxford University, Bloxham's alma mater. How does its inclusion help our understanding of the ostensible subject of the article, a man who died in 1878? ¶ However, I think you're asking about reference number 5. An IP whose interests and written style resemble yours already asked, and I already responded. -- Hoary (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Srbernadette, it might be helpful to you if you were to read the essay Wikipedia:Coatrack articles. Bright blessings! {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 188.220.144.58 (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Обновление страницы в WIKI 2[edit]

    После внесения дополнений на страницу в Википедии, обновления в WIKI 2 не происходит. Что делать? Сергей Александрович Ермаков (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Updating a page in WIKI 2 After making additions to a Wikipedia page, there is no update in WIKI 2. What to do? (via Google translate)

    Сергей Александрович Ермаков this is a page for questions in English about English Wikipedia. If WIKI 2 copies English Wikipedia, you could try asking them about your edits. TSventon (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Editing a page[edit]

    I'm not an editor, but with the help of someone who is one I can add to one of your pages.

    To your page, "List of fugitives from justice who disappeared", you could add Lester Eubanks, who disappeared while on temporary prison furlough from a shopping mall in 1973, and was never recaptured. Wikipedia has an article on him.

    Joseph N. Stricker 108.78.29.23 (talk) 16:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done! Joyous! Noise! 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Vandalism help request[edit]

    I have noticed some vandalism at Yiddish. Namely, a user named CheezDeez appears to have linked their profile in large font on multiple spots on the page. I attempted to fix the vandalism myself, but I could not find the vandalism via the edit window or the view history window. Would an editor please assist me with fixing it? Thank you very much! --Reported via Help:Simple guide to vandalism cleanup--> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:9080:F570:146:DF2:EC63:F453 (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, IP user. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and trying to fix it. When vandalism apperas like that at multiple points in an article, it is usually an edit to a template that is used in the article, so it will not show up in the article's history or in an edit.
    Whatever it was, it now appears to have been fixed. ColinFine (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    In fact, there's an item on the WP:Teahouse#CheezDeez that explains what happened. ColinFine (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    English race. English DNA[edit]

    Hello.A little while ago I was looking at the English race and English DNA. I looked again today and couldn't seem to find the items I previously viewed. Have they been removed? Thank you Jimmythecable (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    As far as I can tell no such pages ever existed. Maybe you were on a different website like Conservapedia which might host such nonsense. Simonm223 (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jimmythecable: Closest I can find is English_(ethnic_group) RudolfRed (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    How to filter my watchlist to not include redirects[edit]

    I would like to view a list of all articles I'm watching, excluding redirects. On my Special:Watchlist, I can view my edit watchlist page, and the redirects are in italics, but there is no way to remove them from being displayed so I can see the list of actual articles I am watching. Any way to do this? BhamBoi (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Issues with TeaHouse[edit]

    Someone ate the teahouse? EdenBAnn (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello, EdenBAnn. The vandalism has been reverted and I blocked the vandal. Cullen328 (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Just Noticed!@Cullen328 EdenBAnn (talk) 23:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    April 29[edit]

    Vandalism help request from 2001:558:6040:3C:D805:3BB0:6BDB:ECE9[edit]

    I have noticed some vandalism at Megalodon. Namely, the cladogram under the section 'Evolution' has had species deleted and replaced with large-scale links to a locked sockpuppet account. I am having trouble finding a record of this text being inserted, though it appeared with the last two edits. Would an editor please assist me with fixing it? Thank you, 2001:558:6040:3C:D805:3BB0:6BDB:ECE9 (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I suspect that this is vandalism of a template used in the article rather than vandalism of the article itself. I suggest that you bring this matter to the Village pump/Technical where editors with that type of skill tend to congregate. Cullen328 (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Can confirm a template used in that cladogram was vandalised. It was reverted quickly(diff), but these changes can get cache'd for a while if no one purges the affected article.
    2804:F14:80C8:4701:F4E7:1EC8:CF9F:1541 (talk) 02:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Newspapers.com working?[edit]

    I went to edit today, and my newspapers.com free account is inaccessible. Is this resource being a known issue for others too? Any idea when this will be fixed and accessible again? SportsGuy789 (talk) 01:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    In the Hugh Lupton section, I am trying to put a link onto the name Geoffrey Charles Martineau Lupton, who has his own page in the "Chinese Wikipedia" section! Please do the link - I cannot get it right. Thanks - here is the link (Chinese) to Geoffrey Lupton: https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E9%99%B8%E7%AB%AF Thanks 115.70.23.77 (talk) 04:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. "Geoffrey Charles Martineau Lupton" is still a red link to show that English Wikipedia has no article about them, but now, there's a blue link next to it that says "[zh]" that links to Geoffrey's Chinese Wikipedia article. LightNightLights (talkcontribs) 05:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Can you please get rid of the red writing on the name. Geoffrey Charles Martineau Lupton in the "Hugh Lupton" section of this page. It is good to have the link to the Chinese wikipedia page - but the red writing is not good. Thank-you 115.70.23.77 (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! I was the person who added the Chinese Wikipedia link. I hope you reconsider your position. The link being red lets readers know that English Wikipedia does not have an article on Geoffrey, and the blue link next to the red link lets them know that Chinese Wikipedia has an article on Geoffrey. Without the red link, readers would normally expect to read an English article about Geoffrey, and they would be confused when it shows them a Chinese article. LightNightLights (talkcontribs) 05:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Complex copyright issue[edit]

    Over a decade ago, a user rewrote substantial portions of an article as part of a push to bring it to GA status (which it still holds). Unfortunately it appears that that rewrite involved copying or close paraphrasing apparently copyrighted materials from multiple sources; there are also some references that editor used that are no longer available so I can't verify whether they were copied from or not. Fast forward to today, and a few thousand edits later this article contains a mix of content that's novel, content that's still largely identical to the sources, and a lot of content that's a derivative to some extent of that old problematic rewrite. What's the best way of addressing this? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The best that I can suggest is rewriting/paraphrasing the parts you are fairly sure are still close to being copies of the copyrighted material. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 188.220.144.58 (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If it's part of a wider issue, consider posting at WP:CCI. For the specific article, it sounds like it's necessary to disentangle the problematic content from later additions. How complex that is will depend on what the later edits were. I wouldn't consider mild copyediting to change much, but content by other users adding new sources and text should hopefully be easy enough to distinguish. CMD (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]