Talk:Hooded crow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleHooded crow was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 7, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Untitled[edit]

Feel free to use the picture in the german wikipedia. Kind regards Soebe

Nesting[edit]

"As a rule the nest is placed on or near the ground, on a cliff, in heather or a low bush, but trees are occasionally used." Is that in Scotland? In Scandinavia the nest is almost always placed in trees. Who can find published information about nesting habits?Apus 07:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check, prob in next few hours, jimfbleak 07:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion request[edit]

A good discussion of systematics is completely missing from Wikipedia (even the German one). What needs to be in there:

  • status (review of modern research papers)
  • hybrid zones; discontinuous distribution of Hooded
  • status of Middle East populations (capellatus) Dysmorodrepanis 00:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kraa call notes[edit]

This section mentions three birds and then says "the kraa call notes of the two are indistinguishable" I wasn't sure which way to correct it so I've left it for the author to decide. --Jethrobrice 13:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

I have reviewed this article against the Good Article criteria, and this is what I have found:

  • Well written: Meets criteria
  • Factually accurate and verifiable: Meets criteria
  • Broad in its coverage: Meets criteria
  • NPOV: Meets criteria
  • Stable: Meets criteria
  • Images: Meets criteria

Congratulations! I feel this article meets the GA criterion. Good luck in any future plans you may have for this article! —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 06:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, thanks, that was quick! Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Update Current article has now issues. 2001:4455:364:A800:39A6:A5D8:C903:5E1D (talk) 06:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good species[edit]

In my opinion, one study isn't enough to say it's considered a good species. I think the article should list authorities that split it and those (such as the IUCN) that lump it. At least the easily Googlable ones. I can do this if people think it's a good idea. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 00:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic Range[edit]

I think there is an error in the description of Hooded and Carrion Crow ranges. The range of Carrion extends into Ireland but this is not shown on the map of the article. In addition, the range of Hooded Crow is shown to cover all of Ireland when it actually only lives in part of the island (the NW I think).

I don't think the above is true. I know for a fact that Hooded Crows are extremely common in the south and southwest of Ireland, and I presume is as common in other areas. The Carrion Crow, on the other hand, does not occur here.

If I may elaborate on this, Hooded Crows are also very common (moreso than the Carrion Crow, I'd say) in Eastern Germany (particularly Berlin), but this area is also outside the indicated distribution.--Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Royston' Crow[edit]

The disambiguation page for Royston led me here but there's no mention here that Royston is an alternative name for a hooded crow. Is it or not? If so, where does the name come from? Penguin2006 (talk) 15:20, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely a genuine alternative name from when this was a more common winter visitor to England. It refers to Royston in North Hertfordshire, hence it's presence on the council's crest, and the local newspaper is still the Royston Crow. I'll add this later if I can find a ref. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, interesting. I came across 'Royston' in another place as a translation for 'funnock' or feannog in Irish - the translation called it royston or scalded crow. Scalded crow isn't on the list of alternatives for hooded crow on this article either. I think Royston might be the old English name, scald the old Irish. I had a quick look but couldn't find any citeable references online. Just the article Badb. I have a couple of books I'll check later. Penguin2006 (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cocker gives Danish Crow, Norway Crow and Denmarks, as well as winter/grey/dun/grey-backed crow, and Dunstable crow, but says Royston was the most widely used Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The corbie?[edit]

I've allowed myself the freedom of removing the mention of "corbie", as that does not seem to be a proper name for the grey crow ("Hooded crow"). It is apparently for the black one ("Carrion crow"), or for the Raven. Source. Also, I have added the fact that "grey crow" is also a name used in Denmark. To be accurate, it is the Danish name (Gråkrage : "grå" = "grey" - "krage" = "crow"). As a sidenote, we have both kinds in Denmark, the Carrion Crow is called "black crow" ("sort" = "black"). We also have Ravens. claus (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hooded crow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smiling-like call sounds[edit]

Some reference should probably be made on smiling-like sounds they make. It is almost always very annoying but those who know something about birds say it is simply not a smile because they cannot know what human thinks. --5.43.99.155 (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hi people, just added a link to educational article with video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.barkan (talkcontribs) 08:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issues[edit]

This important article probably needs help right now. 2001:4455:364:A800:39A6:A5D8:C903:5E1D (talk) 06:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with that Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hooded crow[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watchcrow/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted, outstanding cleanup banner and citation needed tags (t · c) buidhe 18:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are just too many unsourced statements for this article to be GA. The cultural significance section could be expanded on the French version article too.  OnlyFixingProse (talk) 06:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Norway[edit]

I saw a lot of these birds on a recent trip to Norway in the Town of Stavanger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.107.33 (talk) 20:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The map shows that. Invasive Spices (talk) 2 October 2022 (UTC)