Talk:TV Globo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jornal Nacional[edit]

I know there's an article as a source but it isn't true Jornal Nacional is watched by 80 million people daily because that's more than half of Brazil's population. Senhora do Destino was watched by 30 millions according to Revista Veja.

1984 Dictatorship Protest[edit]

I took out the sentences, "On January 24, 1984, the network didnt reveal that a protest in Sao Paulo was against the dictatorship. It said the people when there to celebrate Sao Paulo's anniversary." While it might've been true, during that time the government had censures to censure the anti-government views. Saopaulo1 03:57, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

Ok, freedom of the press was certainly limited in that period. But even if Rede Globo had had its reasons not to air the correct information (which is extremely argueable, since that network is known to have been an important supporter of the dictatorial military government) it wouldn't change the fact that that news report was aired. I mean, you can't suppress reference to that fact simply because you believe the network had justifiable reasons to lie about the protest. Besides, I dont't think Rede Globo (as a corporation) really had an anti-government stand at that time.

I think we should check the source (maybe the Channel Four documentary) and put that piece of information back (in a less macarronic English, please) Leschatz 17:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is that while other networks, like the then just arrived Manchete aired live coverage of the protests, Globo decided not to do so because of its preference for the militar dictatorship that had given Globo plenty of privileges. What's more, Globo, instead of ignoring those protests, a behavior that could have been understood under the fear of governamental censorship, lied openly inventig a story that wasn't true. Try search "diretas ja" and "Manchete". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.32.254.43 (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The picture used[edit]

The picture in the article is absolutely horrible! I vote we take it out, as it contributes nothing to the article. If a picture is to be used, it should be something representative of Globo, like their symbol, not a random picture from a not-particularly-popular show.--Vertigo200 01:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Agree and upload fair use logos. I think we need a good Projac photo, from a press release of Globo. --Brazil4Linux 14:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement[edit]

The article claims that Rede Globo is "(...) recognized as the world's biggest TV network in territorial extent, encompassing all of the States of Brazil." and a few other things that have no basis for. There's an absolute need to give references for such claims. --Rafa 07:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the information regarding being the 4th largest in the world don't have actual sources, but a snippet in a gossip column, that also do not cite sources. This reference [1] should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1025:1:BE30:5BFF:FEDF:DA65 (talk) 16:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Globo Ratings[edit]

Does anyone know where can Brazil TV ratings be found?

IBOPE jggouvea 14:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Globo84.jpg[edit]

Image:Globo84.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Globo83.jpg[edit]

Image:Globo83.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Globo77.jpg[edit]

Image:Globo77.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Globo20years.jpg[edit]

Image:Globo20years.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy[edit]

Never seen on Globo.

Is broadcast after Altas Horas, on Saturday. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 20:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

240i[edit]

Added this resolution in most regional VHF transmissions. Only great urban centers transmit analog 480i VHF. Sky, Brasilsat transmits 480i digital signal. The ISDB-T 480i but with higher bitrate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.12.18.248 (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After 11:45 to 6:00[edit]

Some programs should be add there, such as Globo Rural and Jornal da Globo. And if someone knows this, please answer, what is on Globo after, Jornal da Globo? -- Vian Brasil 22:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC -3)

You can be bold and add yourself the missing programs. You can find Globo's schedule here. The program after Jornal da Globo, according to the link I provided, is Programa do Jô. Hope that helps. --Carioca (talk) 02:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article lacks a lot of information. For example the quality standard idealized by Walter Clark, "Padrão Globo de Qualidade" and the fact they pushed the brazilian TV to international standards. Another notable fact they conviced Sony Corporation to develop an exclusive side-by-car camera vt system SPTV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.78.78.169 (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From the article[edit]

I've removed two related sections from the article because they are poorly written and improperly verified, and that it is not clear whether the content is in fact related to the article. See below. I'm also moving a comment from the top of this talk page to this section, most likely by the editor who put the content in the article. Drmies (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From the talk page:[edit]

tooholli I am considering an addition for a topic of interest to social scientists. Because of Rede Globo's measurable population penetration over time, researchers have been able to gauge social response to telenovelas (soap operas) in terms of female emancipation, awareness of societal ills like domestic violence, fertility rates and education. There are a number of studies that have found interesting relationships between the availability of these telenovas and a changes in these qualified areas. I feel that these studies are a notable addition and am interested in the community's comments. Thanks! Tooholli (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of Interest to Social Scientists[edit]

The measurable population penetration of Rede Globo’s soap operas, or telenovelas, has aroused attention in the social sciences as a platform from which to examine the impact of soap operas on female empowerment and emancipation [1] (Chong and La Ferrara, 2008). In a demand driven assessment over the course of three decades, researchers found indications that the most popular soap operas are those featuring independent women in positions of power[2]. These soap operas often featured divorced characters- a culturally taboo subject, and illegal[3]until the 1970s- and characters involved in affairs. Researchers have examined the data and discovered links between the availability of these soap operas in rural areas and an increase in divorce, decrease in fertility[4], reduced gender preference for offspring, and an increasing awareness that domestic violence is not universally accepted as a life condition[5]. “Divorce is a salient topic from the point of view of development” (ibid). In fact it has been observed that the possibility of divorce gives women leverage to achieve greater gender equality within marriage, for example, in the distribution of work (ibid).[6] Unilateral divorce laws have also been shown to decrease domestic violence, spousal homicide, and suicide (Stevenson and Wolfers, 2006)[7]. At the same time, divorce may have long-term adverse effects on children (Gruber 2004)[8]. An additional and promising finding was that, “ceteris paribus, Globo coverage has the same effect as an increase of almost 1/2 year in women’s education, in a context where the mean of women’s years of education over the period is 3.2 years.”[9] Other studies[10] on the effects of social messaging in media have shown similar results. Debate on potential policy implications continues, but there remains a theoretically exploitable link between social messaging in television media and the practical advancement of social awareness. See indian soap opera under ‘Further Information’ for indications of this approach at work in India.

Citations for Section: Of Interest to Social Scientists[edit]

[1] Chong and La Ferrara, “Television and Divorce: Evidence from Brazilian Novelas”, p. 459, Journal of the European Economic Association [2]Fadul, Ana Maria (1999). “Novela e Familia No Brasil.”Working paper, Congresso Brasileiro de Ciências de Comunicação, Rio de Janeiro.[3] “BRAZIL: Land of No Divorce” Time Magazine, 10 Sep 1951: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,815340,00.html#ixzz13CKLXHHc[4] La Ferrara, Eliana, Alberto Chong, and Suzanne Duryea (2008). “Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil.” BREAD Working Paper No. 172.[5] Chong and La Ferrara (2008), “Television and Divorce: Evidence from Brazilian Novelas”, p, Journal of the European Economic Association,463 [6] Yodanis, Carrie (2005). “Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality.” Gender and Society, 19(5), 644–659.[7] Stevenson, Betsey, and JustinWolfers (2006). “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 267–288. [8] Gruber, Jonathan (2004). “Is Making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long-run Implication of Unilateral Divorce.” Journal of Labor Economics, 22(4), 799–833[9] Chong and La Ferrara (2008), “Television and Divorce: Evidence from Brazilian Novelas”, p, Journal of the European Economic Association,464 [10] Jensen, Robert, and Emily Oster (2008). “The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women’s Status in India.” Working paper, University of Chicago. -La Ferrara, Eliana, Alberto Chong, and Suzanne Duryea (2008). “Soap Operas and Fertility:Evidence from Brazil.” BREAD Working Paper No. 172 -Htun, M. (2003). Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge University Press. -Olken, Benjamin (2006). “Do Television and Radio Destroy Social Capital? Evidence from Indonesian Villages.” NBER Working Paper No. 12561. -Paluck, Elizabeth Levy (forthcoming), “Reducing Intergroup Prejudice and Conflict using the Media: A Field Experiment in Rwanda.” Forthcoming in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 468 Journal of the European Economic Association -Rios-Neto, Luiz (2001). “Television,Value Constructs, and Reproductive Behavior in Brazilian Excluded Communities.” Paper presented at the XXIV General Population Conference, United Nations (2007). World Economic and Social Survey: Development in an Ageing World. Geneva. Vidal-Luna, F., and H. Klein (2006). Brazil since 1980. Cambridge University Press.

Reliable Sources[edit]

Hey everyone, I think we need a better source for this information: Globo is the second-largest commercial TV network in annual revenue worldwide behind just American Broadcasting Company. I was looking for a more reliable source but could not seem to find it, can anyone help me? The current source, from gossip website O Fuxico is simply not reliable. Thanks!! Zalunardo8 (talk) 10:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical accounts missing[edit]

There are no references whatsoever: on the (widely watched in Brazilian journalism schools) documentary "Beyond Citizen Kane" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_Citizen_Kane; to early connections to US television corporations (shown in the film above); to the open support to the military government by Globo TV (from 1964 to 1985: coinciding with Globo's monumental rise in audience and coverage); among many others: see article in Portuguese (google translator helps).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rede Globo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rede Globo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalized article[edit]

This article has been vandalized recently. Please revert back to the latest non-vandaliZed version. J4lambert (talk) 16:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Rede Globo affiliated stations [edit]

Please consider incorporating material from the above draft submission into this article. Drafts are eligible for deletion after 6 months of inactivity. ~Kvng (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 May 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 12:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rede Globo → TV Globo – New common branding Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 06:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Their website still calls them Rede Globo, and there are other sources around using that name. @Mvcg66b3r: please could you provide some evidence that the common name in reliable sources has changed, as per the conditions at WP:NAMECHANGES?  — Amakuru (talk) 06:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the company still refer itself as "Rede Globo" and i think it is to be remain until most recognizable English-languag reliable source refers it to the new name. 36.77.74.198 (talk) 09:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support because this is the network's new name. —ÐW(T·C) 17:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Use in English-language sources has picked up:
Usage in Portuguese seems mixed—but "TV Globo" search queries outweigh "Rede Globo" in Brazil over the last 12 months. I'd support, personally, especially when Variety (my go-to yardstick for foreign TV channel naming) has fallen in line. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:TV_Globo&oldid=1210779306"