Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical reconstruction of the sort of person Jesus would be

An almost direct copy of Cultural and historical background of Jesus, now is permanently redirected to that article. The title is totally POV and invites speculation, which we don't allow on Wikipedia. (see Wikipedia:No original research). I'm not placing this on WP:TFD because there is content and so it would be inappropriate. - Ta bu shi da yu 01:56, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete, needless duplicate created by someone trying to prove a point. Shane King 07:06, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
Can I vote to vandalize? No? OK, Delete. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:40, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
Delete Not encyclopedic. Flafaire 09:16, 15 Dec 2004
Del --Catullus 09:22, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not encyclopedic. utcursch 10:48, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. What Would Jesus Be? Katefan0 14:14, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Useless as a redirect, and can never lead to an NPOV encyclopedic article. [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 15:54, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Doesn't belong here --Spangineer 16:02, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
Just Delete it. Wyss 19:11, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete --fvw * 19:50, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
Thank you for using VfD, TBSDY. Delete. It's edit war incarnated in the body of an article, and I'm washing my hands of its death. If it rises on the third day, delete that too. Cool Hand Luke 05:47, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Death to POV forks, and articles created for edit-war purposes. Jayjg 00:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, but why is there a picture of Jimbo Wales on the page? Rhobite 04:48, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

That was a well-intentioned joke from the Sollog talk page (not by me). Wyss 11:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hmm... actually it wasn't. Though it could be. - Ta bu shi da yu 12:55, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)