Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transitionist

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 14:05, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Transitionist[edit]

Unencyclopedic! Svest 07:59, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

Ow. My head hurts. Delete. Bearcat 08:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Some kind'a essay or somethin'. I'm not really sure what the point was. But it's not an encyclopedia article, that's fer damn sure. Postdlf 10:18, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original somethin'. jni 13:25, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Unless this is something massively profound that I just don't get, it seems to be patent nonsense. A Man In Black 06:29, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I like it.Yes, I agree that it's not encyclopedic, but that's because it's new. Feels like a cutting edge concept to me. Thseamon
- Then when it's cohesive enough a concept to be encyclopedic, then it can be added. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG DELETE. Patent nonsense, indeed. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - belongs on someone's personal blog, perhaps, but not here. Whig 07:08, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.