Talk:Ludwigsburg

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Translation woes[edit]

i am unable to translate the terms regarding administrative subdivisions satisfactorily because someone has translated "regierungsbezirk" as "region", leaving "region" ambiguous. Badanedwa 21:33, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)

the picture of the main palace at the bottom of the article seems somewhat misplaced. if someone reads this before i learn how to place pictures, maybe it can be moved to the other 3 pics. cheers number29 23:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fixed it :] number29 19:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as 'the rifraly team of Ludwigsburg'. Is that a somehow misspelled reference to the 'Schützenverein' (marksmen club)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.72.223.208 (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Complete overhaul suggested[edit]

Given the significance of this town, including its history, the castle, the local businesses and attractions such as the Märchengarten (that is, incidentally, mentioned in other articles), it's about time somebody did a full scale translation based on the German page - surely...BuzzWoof (talk)

It's a wonderful place. I lived there for 10 years and miss it a lot. I may take this on. Marrante (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Pattonville? --Henrig (talk) 09:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, no. I lived in "real" Ludwigsburg. Marrante (talk) 21:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am I the only one who finds it odd that a seccion titled "Jews and Second World War" takes up one third of the article? Besides, the information there is almost irrelevant, it does not refer actually to the Jews but to a number of WWII related events, and it's poorly explained and clumsily glued together for no apparent reason. There should be a proper "History" seccion in which all these things are put in some order and context, and given the space that it is due or otherwise delete the current one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.49.189.214 (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul[edit]

For today, I have made additions to the sections Public Institutions and Education in an effort to bring this article more in line with it's German counterpart.

Over time and in loose succession I shall try to continue this work. --Terminally uncool (talk) 18:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ludwigsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]