User talk:Inpectore

Welcome!

Hello, Inpectore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FearÉIREANN^(talk) 01:30, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm curious. What is the source for Image:Arms14h.JPG? We need to know for legal reasons so that the image can de defined for copyright reasons. Images with unknown sources and unknown copyright status can end up being deleted in case they breach copyright law.

Also, where is this new image being used by the Vatican in preference to the tiara-less one? I much prefer the one with the tiara, BTW. I think a papal coat of arms without a tiara is hideous looking, especially one that has a triple-tiered mitre, something that is a contradiction in terms, as mitres are never triple-tiered. Slán. FearÉIREANN^(talk) 01:30, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MOCcross2.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MOCcross2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Benedetto 15.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 18:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Arms14j1a.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arms14j1a.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MOCBanner2.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Banner2.JPG. The copy called Image:Banner2.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MOCBanner2.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MOCBanner2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Salvatore J. Cordileone has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 16:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your changes, which are in violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Please join the discussion at Talk:Salvatore J. Cordileone. Elizium23 (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Benedetto 15.jpg[edit]

The file File:Benedetto 15.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]