User talk:Olessi/Archive03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers 08 February 2006 to 30 August 2006.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary. Thank you. Olessi 00:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If a conversation is spread across the talk pages of multiple users, I take
the liberty to copy related snippets to this talk page. Some comments were not
directly written on this page, but are always shown in the correct context.
Formatting may be adjusted for consistency.

Your comments on the article talk page are most welcome. --Ghirla | talk 14:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German notice board[edit]

Great idea. Thanks for letting me know. I've added it to my watchlist. Seems to be pretty empty still. Is it new? --Mmounties 01:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • PS: you really speak some Platt? I understand some but speaking???? Naaaaaa....  :)
Checked out the notice board. Love it! Thanks. --Mmounties 05:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. I don't have time even to keep up with what I'm already involved in, so I'm going to pass on this; in general, my sense has been that German-related and Germany-related material is already being handled by a lot of very competent, scholarly people. - Jmabel | Talk 06:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So let me ask you this: How did you come to be the first one to tell us about it? I think it's going to be a huge success. Way to go!!!! --Mmounties 07:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for welcoming me back. I will not stay active on Wikipedia for long now either however, but I will make cerain edits that I have planned during the course of the next week. Happy editing for you too. DeirYassin 17:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal Germany[edit]

I tried shortening the language in the first item. I have IE so I can't tell how it displays in other browsers. I assume it was fine before you added the point on the New articles page? Please let me know if it looks ok in your browser now. I think I have one more trick in my bag that I can try if this didn't help. --Mmounties 23:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh, beautiful. I like it when it works.  :) --Mmounties 23:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Niederschlesien[edit]

Why do you keep changing Niederschlesien to northwest of Poland if it is located in the southwest of Poland? Pommern is located in the northwest for that matter.

Hi, I just have read the whole thing over and I have realized my mistake. I have realized you were refering to it as a whole, not part of Poland. It's your call if you want to change it.

Ethnic German[edit]

I just gave Ethnic German a huge reworking. I'd appreciate it if you'd look it over, since you are neutral, seem to be informed on these Eastern European topics, and maybe know better how to categorize it and link it to other articles. I'm especially shaky on the Czechia / Poland / Baltic stuff like major settlements, group names, which articles are out there, and Hanseatic and Prussian history, because it's the farthest from Danube Swabian issues. Adam Mathias 19:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

I could, but I have been 'burned' few times by people accusing me of abusing admin powers and not going through Wikipedia:Requested moves. My recommendation is to use this slower, but safer procedure.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Penn State Wiki[edit]

Hi Olessi, I want to invite you to the first meeting of the Penn State Wiki Group, to be held in 116 Osmond Thursday 23--Feb--2006 on campus. Bring a friend! Thanks, Gchriss 02:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take look.

There is no portal/notice board for the Czech Republic. I can count active Czech editors on fingers of one hand and they are too busy to deal with infrastructure. Pavel Vozenilek 14:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: admin - you?[edit]

I'm afraid I grew too much cynical over the time. Long ago I attempted RfA (Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pavel Vozenilek). I got definitely discouraged by result of a RfA proposed by me (User:Rl, take a look, really interesting).

The current system is leaned toward relatively new people which are not much known and didn't get yet into anything controversial. Otherwise the person gets thoroughly besmirched by the all-present trolls (see current RfA on A. Bakharev). (Note aside: IMO current RfA process is defunct since it is people who are not afraid to touch the trolls who keep the ship still afloat.)


Woudn't you like to be an admin? If there are no warriors gnashing their teeths when seeing your name you have fair chance to pass through (and keep your self-esteem intact). That the area of your activity has no admins yet is plus. Pavel Vozenilek 13:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attentions to my contributions[edit]

Wikipedia as a learning material is so great to a young girl like me. At present, I'm still studying and not able to write new articles actively, but minor edits in linguistic articles and translation are what I can do. Straightforward critics and comments, I don't mind if they're reasonable, and I'm glad to receive them as well. Please also check whether I copy complete information without understanding and knowing if it's appropriate. Last but not least, I'd like not only you, but more Wikipedians to talk with me. Goodbye. Imiraven

If you could place a comment on that page under the small fonts item in support of my request I'd really appreciate it. Thanks already for your help. --Mmounties 18:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again.  :) --Mmounties 22:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Don't know what happened there. Somehow what I wrote got erased just as I was saving it. Anyway, thanks for the hint. Didn't know that and will attend to it going forward. -- Mmounties (Talk) 23:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CXan you please once more recheck the [1]. Recent activity of User:203.160.1.47 is all (fairly primitive) vandalism and this edit sticks strangely. Pavel Vozenilek 05:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting![edit]

Thanks!
Thanks!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very mach, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yuengling[edit]

Thanks for the info. I had a problem once before when I wanted to do a name change (move) but the name was already in existence. I had noticed that the history and talk doesn't move with a cut and paste, so I put a link on the talk page, but obviously that isn't ideal. I'll follow your advice in future. Cheers! SilkTork 18:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Yuengling Brewery" Of course! The obvious solution. I really wasn't paying much attention when I did that redirect. Not one of my better moments! The beauty of Wiki is that there will be someone who spots the error and tidies up. Nice one! SilkTork 19:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs under new article announcement on Portal:Germany[edit]

Hi Olessi. I saw that you listed two stubs you created under the new article announcement on the Portal. I don't believe we want to list stubs as new articles. That's why I removed the two stubs from the announcements. But it would be great if you could really translate the German articles. That would simply be wonderful. Stubs usually don't give much information and creating them just so we can say the page exists in the en-wiki doesn't help much. It would be better to leave the links red. Don't forget that stubs also take away the chance for our articles to be picked for DYKs on the main page when they are finally completed because they no longer qualify as "new" articles. But we'd love to have your contributions of full translations advertised on the Portal and perhaps picked for DYKs both on the Portal and the Main Page. That would be great. --Mmounties (Talk) 01:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move of Lombard language[edit]

I notice you voted on the recent proposed move of Lombard language. Please check out a new proposal here: Talk:Lombard language. AjaxSmack 20:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed[edit]

Hi, I wonder if you could take a look at Talk:Erika Steinbach, where among other things one of the editors explains that Polish territory was not occupied by Nazi Germany during WW2 but was "integrated" into Germany instead. I hope it could be useful if not Polish but German editors would voice their opinion there. Well, I'm not sure if you're German but anyway ... --Lysytalk 17:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Memel (disambiguation) --Philip Baird Shearer 17:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kreise: Districts or Counties[edit]

Did you see the new development at the talk page of the WP:GSWN? It appears that district is the official EU translation of the term so (if standardization is useful, which I believe) it might be better to consistently use this instead of county. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 04:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olessi IT[edit]

Why do you include link to Utente:Olessi on italian wiki, when there is no such user? (no problem, just curiosity). Jurohi 08:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for illumination, I didn't know login can exist without the home page. Have a nice day :). Jurohi 09:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please[edit]

Don't remove information on treatement of Poles by Germany in 1939-1945 from articles in the future in such drastic way as you did in Warmia article. I see no reason why the information on that particular part of history should be removed from the article while other historic sections remain. --Molobo 02:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My response to Rory096 at Talk:Nazi crimes in Warmia: >>The disputed section had been the subject of a revert war for two weeks (without Talk discussion) and, IMO, was going into excessive depth in a breadth article. Instead of removing the information altogether as other users have done, I moved it into a new article where information about the time period can be listed in greater detail, and clearly added a link to this new article within the text of the original article. I did not initially add a link to this article in the "See also" subheader; I have now done so. Compare the edits before and after for your own opinion.<< Olessi 04:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason why information about German atrocities against Poles should be removed from main page on Warmia while other parts of its history should remain visible on the main page. Why should be this information treated differently and moved to shall we say "some closet" away from main history of Warmia ? Especially as the article is not too big. Don't remove in future information about Nazi atrocities from any other article before engaging in talk-for example from history of Poznań, Gdańsk, Warsaw, Zamość etc. --Molobo 13:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said before, it is an issue of breadth vs. depth. Are you familiar with such concepts? Olessi 17:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rēzekne[edit]

Moin moin, Olessi! Could you please have a look at Talk:Rēzekne? Thank you! Fransvannes 07:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ogg[edit]

Great, I'm glad I was of some help. Just let me know should you need some more. BTW, limiting the ogg to mono is a neat solution to make the file smaller. //Halibutt 02:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cats[edit]

Hi there. Category:Cities and towns in Kaliningrad Oblast is already a subcat of Category:Kaliningrad Oblast. The only reason the urban and rural settlements are placed directly to Category:Kaliningrad Oblast is because there are still too few articles to justify creating Category:Urban settlements in Kaliningrad Oblast and Category:Rural settlements in Kaliningrad Oblast. Eventually, however, the latter two will be created. Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 22:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Category:Cities and towns in Kaliningrad Oblast is here to stay permanently. It was created as a part of the bigger Category:Cities and towns in Russia project, when the latter cat grew to over 500 entries, and it was requested that subcats be created. Cities and towns in Kaliningrad Oblast is just one of those cats.
As for the style I introduced, it was actually meant as a quick fix so it would be possible to have the audio link but still retain {{lang-ru}}. I am not claiming it to be the final solution, and it can probably be improved somehow. You did, however, implement it exactly the same way I would have in the articles you asked me to check. The only thing is that I would separate different language versions with a semicolon instead of a comma, but again, I don't think there is a rule to that effect.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 13:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön[edit]

Hello Olessi, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Thank you for your kind comments and your vote. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 18:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your ogg files[edit]

That's a VERY nice job, you did there. A couple of very minor comments (and I wouldn't redo anything for it): (1) You seem to roll the "R"s if they either appear in the beginning of a word or after another consonant (specifically B, P, F and T's. You also rolled it in Marienburg and Thorn. I've never heard a German in regular conversation do that (except if they're from Bavaria and even there they only really do it emphasize).  :) Apart from that I only noticed that you spoke Osterode with an open O in the beginning. It should be a closed O like is Ostern, not like Osten; and Frauenburg sounds like Frauenborg. Like I said, the way you pronounced them is perfectly acceptable. These are just some things to consider as you go on. Oh, and I changed the German word for Schlesien from Silesia.  ;-) Hope this helps. --Mmounties (Talk) 23:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ostpreußen should have an open O (in case I mess up which are open and closed, it should sound like Offenburg or Osten). My best guess is that Lyck should be pronounced "Lück" but I've never heard anyone speak of the place, so I may be wrong there. Regarding the "R"s, I believe you can hear them sometimes pronounced that way on stage or even on TV if the speaker wants to make sure the audience gets them (I suppose they carry better than the standard German "R"). I couldn't roll the them if my life depended on it, but, you know, that doesn't necessarily mean a thing. --Mmounties (Talk) 00:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you an email. --Mmounties (Talk) 00:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Mohrungen.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

...Sicherlich Post 22:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey Olessi, i did not know how active you are so i did it this way .. sorry! ... anyway: i still miss the "n" in the word ;o) i asked some other guys on the de-chat they thought the same .. maybe you could draw more attention on that? ...Sicherlich Post 22:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oh seems i heard the old version .. i think 00:37, 5 April 2006 . . Olessi (Talk) is okay .. so forget the deletion request ;) ... happy editing ... ehm and talking ;) ...Sicherlich Post 22:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kusma's RfA[edit]

Hello, Olessi! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on shortening of war crimes section from Wehrmacht article[edit]

Do you think [2] should be reverted?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I left my opinion at Talk:Wehrmacht. Thanks for asking for my thoughts! Olessi 16:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Answer for Bloody Sunday[edit]

I'm citizen of Bydgoszcz so I feel it's necessary to write about Blutsonntag. About people killed by Nazis in Bydgoszcz: http://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/10867_1.html (polish encyclopaedia) http://www.castlesofpoland.com/prusy/bydg_hist_en.htm (previous unsigned comment by User:Truth Seeker 888)

Ogg formatting[edit]

Well, help and info links do not concern me as much as the loss of the lang-ru template. Perhaps we could abbreviate the word "pronunciation" or replace it with something shorter? The only reason why I even bothered to reformat the intro in the first place was to retain both lang-ru and the audio. Your new version looks and reads better, there is no doubt about that, but it loses {{lang-ru}}. I see that as an unacceptable loss. I'll try to tweak the intro a bit more to combine the best of both versions, but I can't promise I'll be successful. Do you have any ideas as to how both templates can be retained without making the intro look ugly? If all else fails, perhaps it would be better to make a small infobox just for audio. It's just a wild idea, though.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 19:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I didn't realize you were not aware of the {{lang-ru}} template's details; I should have explained. You are right that there is no visual difference. The template, however, also adds metadata, marking the text as written in the Russian language (by means of the HTML span tags), which, among other things, is important for indexing the text by the search engines. See template talk:lang-ru and template talk:lang-uk for more information on that. I realize, of course, that having audio is more important than having metadata, but since the two templates are not mutually exclusive, I'd rather that we find a way of combining them somehow.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 20:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I wouldn't! The more the merrier.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 20:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I replied to David's comment on my talk page.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 18:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be useful; are there any template-makers-for-hire available? Olessi 22:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but since I don't know any, I'll try to make one myself this week. Just let me know if David's version above looks OK, or if you want it to look differently (if so, please provide an example I can work with). Thanks!—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 01:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I drafted the {{Audio-ru}} template, which is for Russian only. To use it, type:

{{Audio-ru|Правдинск|RU-Pravdinsk.ogg}}

which produces:

Russian: Правдинск​

To make a similar template for any other language, just copy the template source to an appropriate place and replace of instances of "Russian" with the name of the language you need (e.g., "German"), and all instances of "ru" with that language's code (e.g., "de"). Hope this helps.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 15:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Zorndorf, etc[edit]

You are welcome. The European theatre of the S.Y.W. - like most other 18th-century conflicts in which English speakers didn't take part - are seriously neglected in WP. In fact, the parent article about the Seven Years' War should be rewritten thoroughly. The Military Project is active nowadays; I hope they will get to this important subject sooner or later. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My user page[edit]

Thanks for reverting the anon on my user page. He had a point, though :)—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 18:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iser[edit]

Hello Commander! Would you mind taking a look at Iser (disambiguation)? Iser redirects to Wolfgang Iser, although I'm not sure why; ISER brings up more Iser Google hits than Wolfgang Iser, although the word "Iser" seems sufficiently uncommon to have a primary meaning. Hence, my preference for moving Iser (disambiguation) to Iser. Olessi 19:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion seemed reasonable so I have been bold and enacted it.--Commander Keane 00:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William Tennent[edit]

Who the fuck are you? :) --Caliga10 02:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Towns in Poland[edit]

Hi Olessi. I am aware that letters with diacritics are placed at the end of the alphabet, but that seems preferable to mixing letters. Is this a problem? By the way, the category already had some articles categorized under letters with diacritics, I just finished the job. Appleseed (Talk) 01:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version under de:Image:De-Sensburg.ogg as your file was not proper german. Thatsways i put a deletionrequest for your file ...Sicherlich Post 18:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

maybe listen to my file; first the "s" is wrong; it sounds more like an "z" in german. and the "burg" is as well different spoken (dont know how to describe it ;) ) ...Sicherlich Post 20:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Pretenders Ernst August[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Ernest Aug. and constibute to the discussion there. I look forward to people assessing UE:should English be used in all these cases and how; would any sort of numeral be acceptable; what are the correct ordinals anyway; and Is there any other sustainable way to disambiguate these systematically. Shilkanni 11:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P10[edit]

Hi, Olessi. I'm writing because you commented the first time the List of Perfect 10 models was hastily put on AfD because some mistook the title for POV. The reason for re-nominating it is even worse. Take a look. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Perfect 10 models (second nomination) --Alsayid 18:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

For improving the article on Frederick the Great. --Molobo 15:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism[edit]

thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page [3] I didn't even notice it. with kind regards.. Gryffindor 10:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yasnaya Polyana[edit]

Hi, I saw you are interested in the village of Yasnaya Polyana in the Kaliningrad Oblast. I want to inform you that I've changed the location of this page to Yasnaya Polyana (Kaliningrad), because the more commonly known use of this name belongs to the former estate and now museum of the writer Leo Tolstoy. I've also created a disambiguation page, and changed all references where appropriate, except the one on your user page: User:Olessi/Info. I hope I've not caused too much of an inconvenience. Errabee 10:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request done[edit]

You wrote:

Moin, Kusma! Would you mind helping me move James Goldman (actor) to Jim Gardner? The individual in question is a Philadelphia news anchor, NOT an actor. Wile his birthname is James Goldman, "Jim Gardner" is by far the most common name used to refer to him. I tried to correct the title myself, but I messed up a move somewhere along the way and cannot complete the process myself. Any assistance would be appreciated. Tschüß! Olessi 03:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Could you also clean up his section at WPVI-TV Personalities? I was too lazy to check what is duplicated and what isn't. Thanks, and happy editing, Kusma (討論) 13:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also delete the redirect Jim Gardner (reporter)WPVI-TV Personalities. If you think a redirect at Jim Gardner (reporter) is useful, just recreate it. Kusma (討論) 13:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you share your opinion at RM survey at Talk:Sigismund III of Poland Marrtel 23:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to comment, note the proposal here. Tnx for the note about the picture, I replied at Image talk:Teutonic order charge.jpg.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:02, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Gardner/Dave Roberts (reporter)[edit]

Hi. I don't think they are notable enough outside their own area to be included in Wikipedia, so I have started the deletion process. It is better to have them on the big list (WPVI-TV Personalities) with the rest of the non-notable people from their televison station. There is one exception I see from the various lists of the Philadelphia television station people and that is Larry Mendte, who was the host of Access Hollywood, so that would make him notable. Jim Gardner and Dave Roberts haven't done anything like that, given their bios (note: I write this from suburban Cleveland), so they really shouldn't be included. Nigel Wick 19:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you thought about...[edit]

...becoming an admin? I think you would make a good admin and I would be happy to nominate you at RfA.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prussian Homage[edit]

Hi Olessi, I think adding a section called "Treaty of Kraków" to the article is the way to go, and then we might as well add categories Polish treaties and German treaties (or, ideally, create a new cat called Treaties of the Teutonic Knights, a subcat of German treaties). As for the February date, my gut feeling is that it's wrong. Your reading of the pl wp is correct, and here are two more sources: Davies and another. As for the 9 April date, I suppose we could mention both dates with footnotes pointing to each of the sources. Appleseed (Talk) 00:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Gollub War article. There are a number of other wars between the Knights and KoP (as well as HRE and KoP) that need articles, so if you're interested, perhaps we can work on them. For starters, I believe Treaty of Kalisz and Peace of Bautzen don't have corresponding war articles. Appleseed (Talk) 22:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

I'm a big fan of redirects, especially foreign language ones. Could you tag the ones you create with a redirect template as found on WP:R? My favorites are {{R from alternate language}}, {{R from title without diacritics}} and {{R from misspelling}}. Some people delete or RfD redirects they don't understand, so tagging may save some time in the end. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the Arch. of Wrocław article there, but there are complains it is 'too boring'. Perhaps you can suggest a more 'interesting' fact from that article there?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note, after your edits at Treaty of Lake Melno it classifies as a stub so it cannot be DYKed - could you restore some of the info? The article is certainly not too long.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add some info back in, but I don't want to have basically duplicate information there and at Gollub War. Thanks for the notification, though. Olessi 02:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are still questions and issues waiting at Template_talk:Did_you_know#June_5, if you have a few minutes to look at them.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there... Olessi 19:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Teutonic Knights[edit]

Hi Olessi,

Would you happen to know the English names of the titles within the Teutonic Order? Thanks,

Norum 11.06.2006

Succession Boxes[edit]

A while ago, a number of members prominant in creating succession boxes agreed on the format displayed on the Template:s-start/Instructions page. It is not that we discourage images but they take up more space and we believe that a succession box should be concise. If you want to use your images, it would be better if you used another template for that and placed it elsewhere on the page. The succession boxes are really only for dynastic/succession information and images just clutter it up and make it bulky. Sorry, don't take it as a personal offense; a number of us have also attempted similar things but ultimately they are all getting replaced by one of the members of the group if not by someone else first. Regarding alternative language versions of the succession template, I do not claim any authority there so that is up to you. Thanks!
Whaleyland ( TalkContributions ) 08:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yuengling[edit]

Gotta run to appt. now, but I'll take a closer look when I get back. Thanks for the links. -- Tenebrae 15:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Ice[edit]

Hi Olessi,

I looked into this and there is no concrete proof that von Malberg took a part in the battle. The official version has it that only von Malberg and a handful of knights were able to escape death, but some historians seem to disagree with this version. They claim that Grand Master von Malberg has probably never visited Livonia in his lifetime and it was someone else leading the Teutonic Army. That's all I was able to find out. Norum 16.06.2006

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/b/battle_on_lake_peipus

Livonian Brothers of the Sword[edit]

I have realized you also asked me for the translation of Zakon kawalerów mieczowych. It really means the same thing, exceptt if you wanted to translate it literally, it would be more like "Order of the Brothers of the Sword". The word "Livonia" is not used in the Polish version of the Order.

Norum 19.VI.2006

AfD:Names of European cities in different languages[edit]

I notice you've contributed in the past to Names of European cities in different languages and its successor pages. There are proposals to delete these articles and the discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of European cities in different languages, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of Asian cities in different languages, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of African cities in different languages might interest you. AjaxSmack 18:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Markwiki- Frederick II[edit]

Hope this is the right place- I couldn't figure out how to get reference in when I edited Frederick II of Prussia. Can you help? The quotes you mentioned from Voltaire all came from Homosexuality & Civilization by Louis Crompton. I did list the book in the reference section, but couldn't get it into the area where I could do footnotes. Any help you can give would be great. Thank you.

Frederick II[edit]

Thanks again for your help with that article! It looks great, and I'll use the footnotes function from now on. Markwiki 20:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summary by Alex Bakharev at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Irpen[edit]

Your have endorsed the summary by Alex Bakharev at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Irpen which misinforms the community. Alex Bakharev wrote about Russian architecture: "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion on the talk page and solution has been proposed. (Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Irpen#Comment_to_the_summary_by_Alex_Bakharev_and_others). I suggest you to withdraw your signature under the summary.--AndriyK 08:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Naming conventions[edit]

hi, i inform u that in accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) i removed the names of the hungarian kingdom administrative divisions that were provided as alternate names for contemporary romanian administrative divisions from the leading paragraph in their coresponding articles Criztu 10:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC) criztu[reply]

Someone has sent for the cabal![edit]

A Mediation Cabal case in which you are named as a participant has been opened. Please read and participate at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-17 names of administrative divisions of Romania. Your friendly cabalist, Stifle (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voivodeship thanks[edit]

Thanks for helping out with the Voivodeship changes. It's been a long messy business, but it looks like the end is in sight.  :) --Elonka 02:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liegnitz/Legnica -- German or Polish Verb?[edit]

I redirect you to Talk:Legnica, as I added a question to the bottom, as you are one the main contributors to that article. Ameise -- chat 19:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.