User talk:Martin Wisse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Martin :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

Check out the Wikipedia:New user log, or here's some stuff you can do, if you want:


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


We don't like users signing articles, since anyone can edit a page, everyone's an author. Your user name will always be present in the article's "Page History", however.

Thanks, and keep contributing! Dysprosia 09:43, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Dutch naval ships[edit]

Hi Martin - one of the basic principles of categorisation on Wikipedia is that articles should not generally be categorised into a category and another category below or above it. Since "Royal Netherlands Navy frigates" is a specific subcategory of "Military of the Netherlands", it's not best practice to include an article in both. I created the more specific category to parallel what's being done with other navies. Note that articles in "Royal Navy frigates" are not also listed directly under "Military of the United Kingdom"... Anyway, nice to see some non-UK and non-US ships turning up! :) --Rlandmann 21:50, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Your unexplained image reversion[edit]

Hello; could you please explain why you reverted Image:Vampyroteuthis illustration.jpg from the (IMO superior) colour version I recently uploaded, to the grainy, black and white scan that I had originally put up? Unless you tell me otherwise, I'll assume it was a mistake; I've reverted the image back to the colour version and I can only hope it stays that way. -- Hadal 08:10, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Oh, no problem then. I was afraid you had reverted the image because there was something horribly wrong with it that I hadn't yet clued in on (*relief*). I suppose you may have clicked the "(rev)" link next to the old revision by mistake, perhaps thinking it would show you the old revision rather than revert to it? (To see an older revision of an image, you'd click the timestamp link, e.g. "08:14, 2 Feb 2004".). In any event, thank you for your quick reply. Cheers, -- Hadal 06:55, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Tanks of World War II[edit]

Howdy Martin.

I'm actually in the process of phasing out using the conflict as a method of categorization of the vehicles. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Weaponry for details on the proposed standard. Oberiko 01:37, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Ligne Claire[edit]

Hi there, Nice work on the article but the final paragraphs are a little repetitive perticularly the bit about Tardi and Adele Blanc-Sec. I thought you may want to edit it before I do? --MarkB 23:05, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Nothing to improve on there there Martin. :) Thanks for your work on the article. Glad to see another Tardi fan there - is he translated into Dutch or do you read him in French? I always imagined him to be a very franco-centric writer that may not transfer too well to another language (or even outwith Paris given the way in which the town becomes a character of its own in the series)...--MarkB 11:27, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week[edit]

Could you consider voting for Partisans (Yugoslvia) as a collaboration project? AndyL 17:21, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Partition of India[edit]

You voted for Partition of India, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

Collaboration of the Week[edit]

Your vote for African art has helped bring about the article's selection as this week's Collaboration of the week. Please join in trying to make the article a feature.

The Humungous Image Tagging Project[edit]

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Chilean coup[edit]

Please see my comment at Talk:Chilean_coup_of_1973#Opposing_views_of_the_coup. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:32, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)

Bushytails[edit]

Do not blank RfA discussions. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 20:45, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

British comic[edit]

You voted for British comic to be the comics collaboration, and since it now is, we'd appreciate your help in working on it to get it to Featured article status. Please discuss what needs to be done on Talk:British comic#Collaboration and thanks in advance. Steve block talk 14:22, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

please do not leave categories as empty[edit]

I noticed that you emptied out "Category:Communist parties in Turkey". If you want to delete a category, please use {{cfr-speedy}} or other appropriate template. -- Fplay 02:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan categories[edit]

Hey there. I've been going through Special:Uncategorizedcategories, and I noticed that you blanked the category Communist Parties in Turkey about a week ago. If a category is unused and unneded, can you please mark it for speedy deletion with the {{db}} template, rather than just leaving it orphaned? Thanks. -- SCZenz 01:12, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean coup of 1973[edit]

I'd be interested in your opinion at Talk:Chilean coup of 1973#Differentiating the deposement from the coup. - Jmabel | Talk 06:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Trotskyist organisations[edit]

I need to ask you why you removed this subcat from Category:Communist parties and placed it in the Category:Socialist parties. Surely, anyone agrees on the fact that Trotskyism is indeed a form of Communism - unless you have knowledge of some hidden fact. Dahn 20:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I want to point out several issues: there is no "mainstream communism" in reference to Trotskyism, but rather several; of these, many are in an identical situation (including what you had in mind as the "official communism" - Stalinism and post-Stalinism, I presume: the ruling parties in the GDR, Poland, one-time Romania, et al. have avoided calling themselves "communist"). There is a major ambiguity in the case of Marx's followers in the very beginning, I admit it: you have a Kautsky, a Trotsky, and a Stalin. But: following Lenin (which is what all Trotskyoists do) should be a shibboleth of Communism (since it steps out of the vaguery); Trotskyism was not only initiated by a CPSU official, it was initiated by a CPSU official who was deemed and admitted to being more left-wing than the mainstream communist party. Is this a good point I'm making? Dahn 20:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Anti-tank vehicle[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Anti-tank vehicle, by Sus scrofa (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Anti-tank vehicle fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

superfluous talk page, no prior history


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Anti-tank vehicle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Criminal Tribunal[edit]

I suggest you take the out of process close to DRV. I'll be there. do you want the content? DGG (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC

James D. Nicoll[edit]

Thanks for your clean up of the first half of the James D. Nicoll article. However, your reversions in the later part of the article do not accurately reflect the sources cited and as such constitue Original Research. I will be removing the 'original research' from the later portions of the article if valid sourcing is not provided for the claims made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.69.137.41 (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Good Version'[edit]

Apparently the 'good version' of the article James D. Nicoll is one where sources are misquoted?? The 'rife vandalism' is the conversion of a fact based article to an unsurced fan homage. Please actually read the sources quoted before declaring 'vandalism'207.69.137.7 13:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would take your 'warning' not to 'vandalise' the article seriously if any of my edits had ACTUALLY been vandalism. Requiring statements within the article to reflect what the sources actually say is not vandalism. Reverting to the versions that misquote, is. SavingJDNfromthefilk 12:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I saw you here, and read your views on your user page about Wikipedia. I too subscribe to some of them (repeat some of them) though with a little modifications. --Bhadani (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

di Stefano[edit]

Do email Jimbo. I've been round that loop as well, it's far from straightforward. Guy (Help!) 21:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sturmtiger 1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sturmtiger 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew effect (Sociology)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Matthew effect (Sociology), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Matthew effect. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Matthew effect a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of tags[edit]

Why did you remove three justified tags from an article in this edit? Debresser (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And from Crown of Slaves also.

Please take into account that if you continue making such edits without replying to posts on your talkpage, you will likely be branded a vandalism editor in the near future, and this account blocked. Debresser (talk) 09:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoor[edit]

Thanks for trying again with the Spoor article, but the arguments from the AfD pretty much still apply. DS (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Ryk E. Spoor[edit]

Information icon A tag has been placed on Ryk E. Spoor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. LovelyLillith (talk) 21:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fyi[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) EEng (talk) 01:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Martin Wisse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Martin Wisse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Martin Wisse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Martin Wisse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skyman[edit]

Notice

The article Skyman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Texas Comics for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Texas Comics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Comics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mooonswimmer 14:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Martin_Wisse&oldid=1144907383"