Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adscam blog disclosure

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Adscam blog disclosure[edit]

The Abscam blog disclosure was an issue for only a week or so. It's now mostly moot and discussed in the sponsorship scandal article. The paragraph on the ethics of publication bans should go into an article on Canadian publication bans in general. Mwalcoff 18:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Merge to Sponsorship scandal. --cesarb 20:08, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge as per above or keep & expand is fine by me. The Cuban Missile Crissis was an issue for only a week or so, too. =) --Asriel86 23:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Sponsorship scandal. --Carnildo 23:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to sponsorship scandal. Would be good if we had an article on Captain's Quarters, the blog that broke the story though. Capitalistroadster 10:28, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Concur with merge. Before someone creates the article, is Captain's Quarters notable for anything besides its role in this incident? --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 00:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge as above. John FitzGerald 16:37, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge as above. --Spinboy 17:23, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge; ideally no redirect. Samaritan 19:38, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn blogcruft. ComCat 06:30, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn blogcruft. scottjduffy 02:20, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge, reasons as above. Radagast 15:27, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge; this incident is merely a minor footnote to the sponsorship scandal. David Arthur 01:27, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep or Merge Certainly do not delete. This is a notable scandal History21
  • Merge with Sponsorship scandal. While notable within the confines of this scandal, certainly not noteworthy on its own. Ntm 22:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Merge; I concur with the above. Iotha 04:27, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adscam_blog_disclosure&oldid=49907265"