Talk:Girlie men

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"used by some"[edit]

"used by some" Note the passive of non-attribution in this assertion. Foolishness attempting to masquerade as coxcombry. --Wetman 18:09, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Original research[edit]

"However, it has been put forth that attributing the phrase as derogatory to homosexuals by critics is due to their own issues with stereotyping homosexual men as effeminate."

This is orginal research. I once received a warning for less than this.

And "testicular fortitude"? What kind of wording is that for an encyclopedia?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by A gx7 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Irony[edit]

"The two characters, somewhat ironically, were characterized as cousins of Schwarzenegger's." What is ironic about this? 71.136.232.178 (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two sides[edit]

"a variety of blogs on both sides of the ideological fence" There's an ideological fence with two sides? I don't think so. 71.136.232.178 (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

This article is extremely bias. It only depicts Schwarzenegger's use of the word in a political context. This phrase was used as to describe heterosexual men who appear and act physically weak. The whole article should be deleted or rewritten. Evidently this article has been rewritten by some angry homosexual looking for a cause. Dumaka (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girlie men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]