Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishlaobuttie

Vishlaobuttie

Probable hoax. No Google hits. DCEdwards1966 04:42, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Disgusting hoax not even worthy of BJAODN. --Idont Havaname 05:54, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Has merit and is applicable. Mrcommunism 07:18, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd like to point out that every single edit by this user was vandalism. Check his history please. [1] Antandrus 08:02, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Mrcommunism seems rather self-confident for a new user. Is he a sockpuppet? Susvolans (pigs can fly) 12:38, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it. Seems like wanton vandalism to me. Norg 07:21, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent nonsense. --Kelly Martin 07:58, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, of course. Antandrus 08:02, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Rant, patent nonsense or both? Delete. Edeans 09:38, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Poorly written hoax (seems as if its been translated from German). -Thryduulf 13:18, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, probable hoax. Megan1967 00:28, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as silly vandalism. Wyss 01:14, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 12:38, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm very tempted to speedy delete as vandalism.-gadfium 05:18, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. I'm tempted too. I wouldn't want a page like this about me sitting in Wikipedia while it awaits a VfD. --Deathphoenix 18:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but not speedy according the current rules. Rossami (talk) 22:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Patent nonsense, or completely non-encyclopedic content at best. Delete, possible speedy deletion candidate. - Mike Rosoft 14:14, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)