Talk:Laplace transform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

article states often L is for managing imaginary[edit]

No. It was investigated as to if it impacts imaginary and how: but was and is not used with imaginary numbers particularly. I could say D or Dx are for managing imaginary numbers. But neither are they to any extent except in afterthought.

Readability[edit]

The occurrence of many Heaviside stepfunctions in the table "selected Laplace transforms" is redundant and only makes sense if one considers the two-sided Laplace transform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hart15 (talkcontribs) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please put new talk page messages at the bottom of talk pages and sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Integral Function is Potentially Confusing[edit]

The transform of the integral function is shown as:

While correct mathematically, why have the convolution on the right side? I don't think it adds much and potentially confuses new readers.

https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Integral

Tables of Laplace transforms don't generally write it like this. Rhodydog (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Initial/final value theorems[edit]

Can someone explain what it means for a complex number to go to infinity? I could understand |s| -> inf or Re(s) -> but just s? 138.232.68.221 (talk) 08:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probability Theory[edit]

It would be welcome to have defined. Can someone please edit to provide a proper definition for those who are trying to read/understand/use as reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrKC MD (talkcontribs) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done
Constant314 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]