Talk:Presumed knowledge of the law

I've done some cleaning and clarification. I cut this sentence: "Secondarily, the debate is focused on the capability of the citizen of being able to understand whether a certain behaviour is legally allowed or not, rather than on whether the verified behaviour was or not a crime (or however not allowed) at the moment it was committed.", since I've no idea what it's meant to mean. Any ideas? Markalexander100 08:05, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)