Talk:Icarus (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

I have never heard that icarus means a computer program that crashes very often. Please correct or drop.

I've never heard of it either, and it seems to be a dictionary definition anyway rather than an actual program. removing. move to wiktionary if confirmed -- Tarquin 21:26, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I've never heard of it, but I saw it referenced from The Matrix character names at the very bottom. Should that be deleted or should this page be amended? Tyrhinis 14:51, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup tag[edit]

The cleanup tag was applied 20:54, 29 November 2006 by User:MosheA with the summary remark "i'm putting up the cleanup tag until this page gets better...and it definitely needs to". I wonder whether the current version would satisfy MosheA's POV. I would remove the tag myself, but I consider it decorative. --Wetman 05:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC) I don't think it needs any cleaning, now does it? The information is quite accurate.[reply]

Not relevant[edit]

The following is typical of edits that offer no information about Icarus and all but no information at all: "In the book "Skellig" Reference is made, along with Persephone of Greek Mythology." --Wetman 17:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also add the icarus class in starquest online.96.224.176.111 (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Icarus Project link?[edit]

It seems to me it would be appropriate to link to the Icarus Project, the grassroots network for those "living with experiences that are commonly labeled as bipolar disorder or related mental illness", on this disambiguation page.

Would it fit under the Institutions and Companies section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.172.65 (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I've added it to that section. Thanks for the suggestion! ~ mazca t | c 14:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]