Talk:Hoverfly

Insects Mid‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

I have a video of one eating a scab on my knee. They like dead mammal tissue it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:CB00:BC00:F800:C479:3433:3FE2 (talk) 02:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

<randlelelandraWiki16Sept>[edit]

Some of the notable strengths of this entry on Hoverflies is the amount of information related to behavior such as “Reproduction and lifecycle” and “Pollination”. The most interesting thing I learned about the Hoverfly is that they are crucial pollinators for a variety of flowers in a number of different ecosystems (Larson, 2001), which I thought was a job designated to bees specifically. This entry is ranked as Start-level and Low on the importance scale. Start-level means that this entry is short and lacking sufficient references. I believe that this entry should at least receive a C-level rating because there are many sources embedded throughout each of the sections. I also think it is interesting how this entry contains a case study specific to the species, which discusses the Hoverfly’s importance in New Zealand as a native species that help with pollination. Though this entry is short, the information that it does contain is complete. It could include categories such as its ecology, interactions with the environment, a description of the species’ interaction with various plants in different environments located throughout the globe, and other details regarding its impact on the environment in order to supplement the entry overall. This information could be detrimental in creating a link between the Hoverfly’s natural behavior and how its behavior contributes to a larger system. Learning more about the Hoverfly’s environment is another way to expand on this research. 12:19 16 September (UTC).

Alien technology[edit]

Think about it.

If we want to explore a planet, instead of sending the shuttles, we send probes. If we want to film penguins in the wild without their behavior being affected by us, we might disguise the probe as a rock or another penguin.

Ever noticed how some wildlife seems to spend quite a lot of time staring at you?

"What is all that hovering about? I watched a number of them hoevering around the front door of a building today, going nowhere, with their little wings doing 10 to the dozen. Chill out, I thought; that looks exhausting. So. What is it all about?"

Smile and wave.

`.^P

Untitled[edit]

Do they sting? Edward 12:01, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Nope. Stan 13:09, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

What is all that hovering about? I watched a number of them hoevering around the front door of a building today, going nowhere, with their little wings doing 10 to the dozen. Chill out, I thought; that looks exhausting. So. What is it all about? --Tagishsimon (talk)

When the listed references generally seem to refer to hoverflies, it seems odd to have chosen Flower-fly for the title here. Any particular reason in this case? --Wetman 05:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None given. Shall we move this to Hoverfly then? Any objections? --Wetman 23:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing reasonable arguments and no objections, I've gone ahead and completed the move. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006 runner up?[edit]

How could you not use Image:Hoverflies mating midair.jpg in this article (yes it needs more text, but that shouldn't stop you from adding a featured pic...)? --Thinboy00's ~~sockpuppet~~ alternate account 00:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Common Name[edit]

Since this group are real flies, the word "fly" is separate. So the correct name of this group is hover flies. Fasulo (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hover flies are often called wannabees. Do not revert this addition. 72.165.28.50 (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You need to put up some kind of reference to support your claim about what they are called. If you include it without a citation it will be removed. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trfasulo is correct. Scorpionflies, for example, are in the order Mecoptera, not Diptera, so they are not true flies, hence the common name is "scoprionfly" instead of "scorpion fly." Because syrphids are true flies, they are "hover flies" not "hoverflies." See page 728 of "Study of Insects: 7th Edition" by Charles A. Triplehorn and Norman F. Johnson, 2005, published by Thomson Brooks/Cole. See also page 25 of "50 Common Insects of the Southwest" by Carl A. Olson, 2003, published by the Western National Parks Association. ArachnoGBH (talk) 18:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

size?[edit]

"The size of hoverflies varies... some... are small... while others... are large..." are you kidding me!? how about giving some numbers!

Bjarthur (talk) 21:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update external links[edit]

Many external links are out-dated. The websites no longer exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.40.80 (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non hoverflies that hover[edit]

Mention if all flies that hover are within the hoverfly family or are there also others. Jidanni (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoverfly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091211155805/http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/Diptera/syrphid/syrphid.htm to http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/diptera/syrphid/syrphid.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoverfly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091206035232/http://www.briancoad.com/Dictionary/M.htm to http://www.briancoad.com/Dictionary/M.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Vena spuria of Eristalis gatesi.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]