Talk:Agathis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Malesia[edit]

What is malesia? Is it the name of a country Malaysia? Gross 14:57, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Malesia is a biogeographical region; explained on its page - MPF 23:26, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fender Squier Standard Telecaster has an agathis body[edit]

I suggest the addition of a well known guitar which uses Agathis. The Fender Squier Standard Telecaster has an agathis body. Stealthorpe (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic distribution of which group?[edit]

In the first paragraph, where it discusses Jurassic distribution, does "they" refer to Agathis or the Araucariaceae in general? The text isn't very clear. 75.213.102.72 (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial link removed[edit]

I removed some material and a link relating to ancient kauri, thinking I would place it on the A. australis page which was the species involved. On closer look the link was a commercial so I won't place it or the material anywhere. Kahuroa (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rot resistant? Really?[edit]

Although Kauri is a fantastic wood for many purposes. It is not really rot "resistant". This term should be reserved for wood such as Western Red Cedar and Teak that contain natural toxins that kill fungus.Cedar is regularly used for house cladding without paint etc. Kauri needs protection from the elements -like most timber- ie paint, varnish or epoxy resin as a water barrier. On the other hand it doesnt rot as quickly as say Pinus Radiata or Kahikatea (NZ white pine). Kauri would never be used in a lightweight hull designed for racing as it is simply too heavy.On a cruising boat it is great, though these days it is usually reserved for areas that are finished bright like the cockpit or cabin. Nz Kauri is now very expensive -if you can get it at all(apart from swamp Kauri or recycled Kauri). In fact most Kauri sold on Nz now comes from Fiji. Fijian Kauri has similar appearance and characteristics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.184.199 (talk) 09:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agathis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claim that a photo of a seed is mislabelled[edit]

The following note was added to the article in the edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agathis&diff=804439052&oldid=787844881. I have moved the note here. I don't know whether the statement is true.

"The provided photo identified as a kauri Agathis australis seed is clearly NOT a seed, but a mismatched image." Nurg (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is indeed not a seed, but a segment or scale from the female cone. A seed would have lain on the scale. I have fixed the image caption.  Junglenut |Talk  22:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution map[edit]

What do the numbered, coloured boxes represent in the distribution map? Density? Species varieties? Something else? Wokepedian (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Authority dates[edit]

@Junglenut: Please use this talkpage rather than my usertalk. I get that when mentioning botanical authorities the date of publication are often omitted, but this is not universal, and you did not attempt to re-add this information elsewhere in the article. I would be okay with removing the dates provided they are included elsewhere in the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]