Talk:Biological warfare

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biological warfare article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Biological warfare is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment: Sustainability High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Treatments[edit]

I corrected the "5% sodium hypochlorite solution" comment in the "Protective Measures" section to reflect the modern standards per MCWP 3-37.3 w/change 1. I could flush out this section with more information, but it would just end up needing to have its own section. I am not exactly sure why there is a treatment section at all in an encyclopedic entry about bio Weapons in the first place - NBCD Chief

Poison is biological warfare[edit]

Someone removed Israel poisoning Palestinian lands in the West Bank claiming it is not biological warfare. See here, poison is mentioned several times in the article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7150198/ Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited doesn't mention biological warfare. Not every instance of poisoning is such. Also undue weight to make an entire section for this. Dovidroth (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not every use of poison is biological warfare, but when poison is used in war, it is, so the info belongs here. The section is not "undue weight", there are sections in the article for many different wars, and this is about the Arab-Israeli conflict, so it needs its own section as it doesn't fit anywhere else.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poison falls closer to chemical warfare than biological warfare. Ap2495 (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Plagues and People[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 2ndReconCorpsman (article contribs). Peer reviewers: EEEpidemiologist.

— Assignment last updated by GardOU (talk) 21:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons of the body, including Mental, Physical and Vocal[edit]

I have questions about the study of verbal, mental, and physical biological weapons.

We have seen time and time again, that weapons turning into supreme/dominating controls have not come from weapons or tools used for distruction. Rather they depth of conversation and mental stamina or control one can create/invent in their mind.

It's not psychology, because that's the study of the inner workings of the brain. Rather its a weapon of biology, one we're born with and defined through history as God, the supernatural per se, and the manipulation of perspective, time and control.

Just opening this discussion up, for future conversation research and studying integrity.

Id like to learn a defense, as a way to prevent and defend myself. People definitely take to verbal and mental intimidation, and manipulation of the environment against me in my career, community, country and family. It seems to set us back generationally, it's a direct target on more than the directly tangible. Our Physical health, our choice, and even if I may say our inate response to cordiality and peace is at stake.

This has to be something we study, and learn to defend against not for. We're targets, we're generational victims, and with little to no defense. 192.111.57.88 (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]