Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bumperstickerism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 04:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Bumperstickerism

The term "bumperstickerism" does not seem to be in widespread use, and is not an appropriate article title. The content may be more at home in the bumper sticker article if appearing on bumper stickers is the defining feature, otherwise epigram, aphorism and the like may be more appropriate --Tabor 00:44, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

• Also, if "Bumperstickerism" is an emerging slang term, perhaps wiktionary would be appropriate --Tabor 00:47, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree that if it's an emerging term, it should be a Wikitionary entry. Aside from that, it's nothing more than a nuisance page.--Mitsukai 01:08, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, too obscure —Teknic^Talk/Mail 05:12, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Only 19 unique google hits. Postdlf 09:15, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into bumper sticker where it belongs. Mgm|^(talk) 09:46, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 11:27, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't pass the Wha test. hydnjo talk 23:00, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or merge with bumper sticker Stancel 23:09, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Redirecting to "bumper sticker" would be ok, but with so few web hits IMO is unnecessary. -- Infrogmation 05:35, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Redirect/merge to Bumper Sticker. Whig 06:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or merge with bumper sticker. --Silversmith 16:16, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.