User talk:Bth

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bth has not edited Wikipedia since 1 July 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I'm pretty much bowing out of active involvement beyond minor copyediting at this point (this has been the effective situation for about a year, but I'm now so disgusted with Wikipedia's takeover by immediatist ruleslawyers that I've no inclination to ever return to active duty), so I've decided to archive my talk. --Bth 16:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bth/Archive

Aw shucks. I was just about to throw some matches into the powder keg at Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources#Recent_issue_with_reliable_sources, based on your statements. Should I hold up and leave things as is then? O:-) --Kim Bruning 19:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Leave my user page alone[edit]

I was simply trying to protect your userpage from an unwanted edit. I'm glad that you logged in and made the changes you wanted. Cheers. Brianga (talk) 08:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SFMOMA.jpeg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SFMOMA.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SF themes[edit]

Hey, could you comment on the last section of the talk:List of science fiction themes, even if just to agree/disagree with my analysis. Every move i make to sort this list (so i can start adding more citations) gets reverted to a very old badly formatted version. With only me working on it, i'd like to form a consensus at least on the way forward, so i point out this consensus when my improvments get removed.

Any request to admins is replied to with "discuss any changes", which is pretty difficult as the only opposing viewpoint is from a "retired" editor who will not discuss. Thanks for any input you can give, even if only to disagree with me :-).Yobmod (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

California Palace of the Legion of Honor[edit]

Hello
You added a lead image to this page a while ago; there is a discussion on the lead image for this page here. You might want to comment...Swanny18 (talk) 16:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Clancy/Jack Ryan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tom Clancy/Jack Ryan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]