Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crew 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Little context. I don't *think* it's encyclopedic, but it's hard to tell from the article. Joyous 00:20, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete: If nothing else, those images look copyvio. Secondly, though, this is a review. Thirdly, this is about a single issue of some comic, so, even if it were in encyclopedic format and not a copyvio, it would be a breakout from some missing master topic. Geogre 00:54, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete both this and Crew 14 (more of the same but shorter).—Rory 16:44, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)
    • It wasn't listed on the VFD page, but I have listed it now. Delete --[[User:Allyunion|AllyUnion (Talk)]] 08:29, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
    • Do you mean that someone vandalized VfD and deleted the entry here? This nomination was at the top of Sept. 2. It's not great to give the article another 2 days on VfD without decision, especially if its author is vandalizing. Geogre 12:07, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
      • Sorry if I wasn't clear. It was marked with the {{vfd}} tag on Sept. 1, and I happen to run into it. --[[User:Allyunion|AllyUnion (Talk)]] 07:10, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
      • If they did vandalize the VfD page, I wasn't really paying attention. And my vote is Delete only because it seems to be an individual article of a magazine or something. It doesn't seem notable either. --[[User:Allyunion|AllyUnion (Talk)]] 07:13, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. If you're not sure, then you shouldn't delete. anthony (see warning) 15:09, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This appears to be an individual issue of a magazine. I am not sure if this magazine is notable, but individual issues certainly are not. Andris 15:23, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Individual issue of a magazine. Those images need to be listed as copyvios too. Gwalla | Talk 05:36, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to Crew (comic) - create stub there (find basics for a sentence/two from Google). Add existing text from Crew 14 and 21 to Talk:Crew (comic). zoney ▓   ▒ talk 11:35, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete both reviews. -Sean Curtin 19:39, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is not just a single issue, its supposedly the last issue. Copyvios can be dealt with (edited, and listed). Can be edited to be encyclopedic.--Dittaeva 15:20, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)