Talk:Lady Windermere's Fan

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
	This article needs an appropriate infobox template.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

For future reference, when the limit on template invocations is raised, here is a list of entries on IMDb: there were 7 exact matches today. --Phil | Talk 13:56, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)

What makes this DC production notable?[edit]

Recently anonymously added: "An important revival of the play directed by the British actor and director, Keith Baxter, opens in June 2005 at The Shakespeare Theatre in Washington, DC, with Dixie Carter playing Mrs. Erlynne. The Shakespeare Theatre" What makes this production notable? And why the link to the generic site of the organization which, as far as I can quickly tell, offers only one uninteresting paragraph about the play, and that not on the page linked to? Unless someone can explain, I don't think this should be here. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:07, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Incidental music[edit]

"…first published…with incidental music by Walter Slaughter." Really? First performed with, quite possibly; I don't believe it was ever customary to publish plays with incidental music, even in the heydey of incidental music. - Jmabel | Talk 06:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Given no reply after 3 days, I'm reverting. This is the reverted edit. If there is something to this, please clarify & re-add appropriately. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 22:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Oscar Wilde.jpg[edit]

The image File:Oscar Wilde.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I'm not clear on why this exists, can it be explained better at the head of the article? Carl Reinke (talk) 10:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a famous play by Oscar Wilde? It needs no more evidence than the section detailing various famous productions of it. So I'm confused at why you ask. Have you read the notability guidelines at WP:Notability? FergusRossFerrier (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

satirize 'Victorian' morals and 'marriage'?[edit]

i have removed the claim that play satirize 'Victorian' morals and 'marriage' due to several reasons. in addition to having no critical work cited for this claim, following should be noted; 1/ play satirizes morals in general,not limited to any particular time, or set of morals. 2/ 'Victorian' is a vague term. 3/ 'marriage' is not morality as article sentence implied. 4/ marriage is not satirized in play. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sittingnut (talk • contribs) 11:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Windermere[edit]

Does Windermere, the largest lake in England, rate a mention in this article? Did Wilde take the name from the lake?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lady Windermere's Fan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.recordeddrama.co.uk/series.php?id=4
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302143607/http://www.ibdb.com/show.asp?ID=5203 to http://www.ibdb.com/show.asp?ID=5203

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]