Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad command or file name

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. No consensus to delete or merge. Postdlf 23:07, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bad command or file name[edit]

A non-expandable article. JoaoRicardo 02:54, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, maybe if Microsoft used it in marketing it would be notable, but they didn't. Gazpacho 06:38, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete From what I can see, no potential to become more than a stub, ever. ÅrУnT†∈ 09:12, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into MS-DOS or Comparison of operating systems and redirect. One error message isn't encyclopedic, but a comparison of different OSes errors for the same problem may be. Thryduulf 20:08, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. GRider\talk 22:56, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge anything useable into MS-DOS, and add redirect. Megan1967 01:19, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Keep, vote changed as per above - There is probably enough material on the internet, judging by Google, to allow it to expand into a proper article. Megan1967 00:33, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. The message that has showed up on computer monitors several trillion times. 69.243.41.28 04:19, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Definately notable, can be made encyclopaedic Beta_M talk, |contrib (Ë-Mail)
  • Keep: For a decade or so, this phrase was famous. I think it's worth keeping the article just because 20 years from now someone might run across the phrase and want to look up what the heck it's about. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:55, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge & redirect, while the phrase itself is notable, I don't see it ever becoming more than a short stub. Put into another article, it can be more encyclopedic, and it won't seem so out-of-place. -Frazzydee|✍ 04:59, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into MS-DOS. — Monedula 11:49, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, but see my comment in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Slogan:The foreskin is not a birth defect. - Keith D. Tyler [flame] 23:00, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, for the same reasons as Jmabel gave. We have pages for programming errors also, such as Segmentation fault. Quite frankly, I'm surprised there are only 21k Google hits on this. I saw it all the time in the MS-DOS days. --Idont Havaname 23:03, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Under that principle, it should redirect to an article with a name like User error. "Segmentation fault" is a term for a type of program failure, "bad command or file name" is an OS-specific user error message. - Keith D. Tyler [flame] 23:24, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge & redirect into MS-DOS. Boffy b 16:43, 2005 Feb 5 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bad_command_or_file_name&oldid=1182538804"