This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
Please read and understand the purpose of disambiguation pages. It is only ment to get people to the correct article out of all the articles that would have the same title. Only one item should be linked per line, as the reader should be able to get to links for other topics from within the article. It is not a general advertising area for articles related to a topic that needs a disambiguation page. Only information to get the reader to the correct topic, no piped linking, and only one link per item. The community came up with this, with a consensus. So if anyone disagrees, bring it up here and get the guideline changed. Otherwise please abide by the guideline. Aboutmovies 01:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Before you get too self-righteous, you might want to re-read it yourself a little more carefully. The guideline recommends Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link; including more than one link can confuse the reader. Not only one link period, but one blue link (and with a caveat for exceptional cases). It is long-standing practice of disambiguation pages to help direct readers to relevant information. If no article exists yet, the next best option is to direct them to a page with the most closely related information available. That is, of courses, assuming that the item needs to be included on the disambiguation page at all. older ≠ wiser 01:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I only saw the links re-added in the changed area which doesn't show red/blue. I'm just used to people linking everything on disambigious pages (as shown before I cleaned-up the page). Aboutmovies 02:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
