Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald johnson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Eugene van der Pijll 21:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Ronald johnson[edit]
Poor chap, he only lived for one day. I hate to say that he's not notable, but I think this is not verifiable. -- Hoary 06:17, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
- Delete. This article is uninformative and incorrectly titled. Cedars 07:25, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Wiki is not a memorial. --Allen3 talk 11:21, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unless there's evidence this sparked a major court case in which case I would vote keep and rename. Mgm|(talk) 16:30, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete sad, but this is not the place. --Etacar11 00:04, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete "and his twim" too (iirc). or merge into an arty on Infant Mortality as an example of pre-antibiotic infant health issues. Strikes me as a poem somebody decided to do as an hoax-arty more than anything likely to come to contemporary attention. My four grandparents buried seven kids before they reached the age of four -- thiry years after this setting. Fabartus 00:13, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wiki not a memorial. -CunningLinguist 02:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete wikipedia is not a memorial. JamesBurns 10:52, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NeoJustin 03:04 June 3, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Who? Not notable! Next! ShureMicGuy 19:13, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.