User talk:Pekkapihlajasaari

Hello "Pekkapihlajasaari" and welcome to Wikipedia. A few tips for you:

Peruse Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and associated pages, such as
You can experiment in the Wikipedia:Sandbox.
Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date.
If you have any questions, see Wikipedia:Help, or you can a question to the Wikipedia:village pump.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian -- Infrogmation 18:53, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Recipients of nanosecond[edit]

The article Recipients of nanosecond has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Recipients of nanosecond for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Recipients of nanosecond, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recipients of nanosecond until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TJRC (talk) 08:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Hi. Thanks for updating the page with more recent and more accurante information but I don't think you should have marked your recent edit to USS Guardian as minor. Minor edits aren't supposed to change the meaning of the text – changing from blaming a faulty chart to blaming human error and a lack of leadership is a significant change to the meaning. Please have a look at WP:MINOR to remind yourself about which edits should be marked as minor. Dricherby (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]