User talk:Denorris
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Helpful links: Editing || Writing a great article || Naming || Style Manual || Policies || Reassigning old edits.
Other Questions? Help || Village pump(everyone gathers here) || What Wikipedia is not
Maintenance: Deleting articles || all maintenance tasks (see also open tasks, below)
Uploading images: please note the origins and copyright status of every image you upload, otherwise we won't be able to use those images in many versions of WP.
Finally, to sign comments on talk pages, type four tildes, like this: [[User:Sj|+sj]][[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 09:02, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC) . This automatically adds your name and the current time.
I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian on en:! Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started. You can also leave me questions at my talk page. +sj+ Saturday, April 27, 17:46 UTC
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Consensus science[edit]
Hi Denise. From your recent talk you sound like you might have an interest in the relatively new consensus science page, or perhaps some useful contributions to its content. — Cortonin | Talk 15:42, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Well, one hot topic at a time. I suspect I will have to rigorously defend myself on just the suggestion of being NPOV about Mann, et al. But in the mean time, you might find this article useful: http://www.co2andclimate.org/wca/2004/wca_29c.html --Denise Norris 15:51, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies[edit]
Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 14:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Roman arithmetic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I believe this is just conjecture not backed up by citations and in fact is not true as they used abacii with stones in rows
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dmcq (talk) 02:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)