Talk:The Music Lovers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Untitled[edit]

I have gone with 1971 rather than 1970 as the release date. IMDb says 71, Halliwell's 8th edition says 70. I prefer the later as there seems to have been a prerelease version in 1970 under a different name (see IMDb link). Cutler 17:45, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I am moving this film from 1971 in film to 1970 in film, because all films are listed in their original country (and language) release. I am also substituting the table with the usual film infobox template. Hoverfish 17:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Themusiclovers1.jpg[edit]

Image:Themusiclovers1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Factual errors[edit]

This is supposedly a factual error: In one sequence, Tchaikovsky and his patron see each other on the road, although in fact the two never met. I understand they did twice encounter each other quite by chance, although they never spoke to each other.

I'm also intrigued by this "Count Anton Chiluvsky". I can find no such person in the literature. There were the brothers Vladimir and Konstantin Shilovsky, with both of whom Tchaikovsky had emotional attachments. Could this be one of them? -- JackofOz (talk) 15:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy sequence?[edit]

Is the the meeting in the canal path not meant to be a fantasy sequence?

63.194.208.34 (talk) 01:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Music Lovers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080310224838/http://www.timeout.com/film/newyork/reviews/73662/The_Music_Lovers.html to http://www.timeout.com/film/newyork/reviews/73662/The_Music_Lovers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]