Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Dream for a Future with Alternative Energy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 16:15, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

A Dream for a Future with Alternative Energy[edit]

Delete essay. Gazpacho 23:50, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete POV, essay, and generally worthless, Gazpacho, you beat me to nominating this one. BigFatDave 23:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete Dave said it best. Bletch 00:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete essay. Rl 09:45, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep essay. I would recommend more factual links but the content does not violate Wiki standards. Bogusstory
- still not growing, it seems the author feels no need to defend/amend their work. At the bare minimum, keeping this article would require re-titling and extensive cleanup, but the article on Future energy development seems to be working in this direction nicely. What is the policy on articles where useful info is scanty, and duplicated elsewhere? BigFatDave 00:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC) (oh, and Bogusstory, "delete essay" doesn't mean 'delete this essay' ... it means 'delete because it is an essay'. So keep essay is sort of a non-sequitur.)
Delete Essay AND POV propaganda. Same guy that brought us the other VfD 9/11 open questions. --Kitch 13:05, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete This does appear in style to be an essay. If the author has some useful additions to give, I recommend they be added to the article Future energy development. -- Glen Finney 20:25, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete Original research. Dsmdgold 15:10, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.