Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

This article seems to not specify a specific Black Fury character, but all the ones referenced in comics. Perhaps the different, but samely named, characters can each have their own entry, followed by a number for differentiation?

Maybe, but I personally doubt that they are significant enough, based on the data in the article, to each merit their own pages. However, a rewrite of the existing one would be in order. Badbilltucker 17:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Film?[edit]

What about the early film about Pennsylvanian coal miners? 68.63.165.28 (talk) 18:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@68.63.165.28: If you have the source to back it up then add it. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox needed[edit]

Someone really should add an info box. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 03:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Fury (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66nTzorDi?url=http://www.toonopedia.com/missfury.htm to http://www.toonopedia.com/missfury.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Fury[edit]

Miss Fury is not widely known as "Black Fury", so does not really belong in this article. 24.149.37.234 (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

She was initially called the Black Fury by characters in the comic strip itself. See Toonopedia citation.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But she is being presented in the article as if she is the primary "Black Fury" (picture and all), when she should, per WP:NAME, be at Miss Fury and this article (if it needs to exist at all) should be about the characters actually commonly known as "Black Fury" (with a note about and a link to Miss Fury). 24.149.37.234 (talk) 23:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could see making Miss Fury an article, since that's how she was primarily known, and including a "main article" link here. What do other editors think? --Tenebrae (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any objections? I'll wait a few more days, and if not, I'll go ahead and do this unless someone else wants to do it first.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]