User talk:Femto

This user is taking an indefinite Wikibreak and will not be active on Wikipedia for an unspecified period of time.

Barnstars

Talk Archive 1 Talk Archive 2

I'll check this page every now and then, if you'd like me to clarify on any important issues of the past, I'm still available, just don't expect an immediate answer. Femto 15:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge of isotope tables

As someone who has maintained Isotope table (complete) and/or Isotope table (divided) in the past, your input is needed. User:Greg L is proposing (and prematurely executing) a merge of the two tables, each about 50k, into one table of over 100k. I am opposing it, and no other editors have commented yet. Please come to Talk:Isotope table (complete) and offer your opinion. Thanks, JWB (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Merger

Femto: What do you think about option #3, which would keep the best of both worlds and would leave only one article? In case other options get added and the numbering gets changed, here is a historical version to show which option I’m talking about. Greg L (my talk) 20:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Isotopes

Just so you know, I mentioned your name at Talk:Isotope table (complete)#Comments to be translated into vote. Otherwise read for yourself. Best regards, --Eddi (Talk) 02:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Spam-i

Template:Spam-i has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The Cougars

Greetings Femto - I saw that last year you deleted an article for The Cougars. I don't know if it referred to the same band that I've just written up about, but please check it out. Hope that you find "my" version worthy of being kept on at Wikipedia. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

The other article was "The Cougars are a group of 10 out of shape badasses from Edmond Oklahoma.", plus a list of members, plus "That is all." Someone tagged it for {{db-group}}, which I carried out. That is all. :) No worries from me about the new page. Femto (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reply. It's borderline notable, but I reckon it deserves its place here at Wikipedia. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2008 (UT

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SIXSTROKE JACK BRABHAM Dear Femto , I invite you to read the australian federal court judgements and ask you to make any remedies that you see fit. malcolm beare federal court costs federal court judgment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malbeare (talk • contribs) 20:18, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Visible light (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Visible light (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Visible light (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Elastic properties of the elements (data page) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elastic properties of the elements (data page) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elastic properties of the elements (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:28, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox element/isotopes stable

Template:Infobox element/isotopes stable has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)