Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tao of Delete

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted, fittingly enough. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 11:58, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Tao of Delete[edit]

Ho hum.. and it's nn to boot (although I think I could be converted)--Doc Glasgow 15:31, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to the creator of this page, THIS is the Tao of Delete. And to that anonymous creator, I'd wait until the term gets at least a hundred Google hits before i'd write an article about it. Right now, it's just a neologism. -- Grev -- Talk 16:17, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete term invented May 11, 2005. Promo. —Wahoofive (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete any item that is not obviously and immediately necessary is removed or deleted — apply that philosophy to this article! --TimPope 16:53, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unread it in the process. (Neologism.) Geogre 18:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only if the real, original name is found. Mosquito 04:04, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that the logical end-rpocess of this is a Wiki containing one article -- this one -- since all other knowledge can be obtained by a phone call (to whom -- now that is the question). --Simon Cursitor 07:33, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.