Talk:Lianhe Zaobao
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Thumbs Up (newspaper) page were merged into Lianhe Zaobao on 29 August 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the ZbCOMMA page were merged into Lianhe Zaobao on 29 August 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
"China" and "mainland China"[edit]
There was a dispute over two versions (see the difference) over China and mainland China. Please refer to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Political NPOV. — Instantnood 10:34 Mar 5 2005 (UTC)
Baffling statement[edit]
"Its regionalisation drive was given a shot in the arm..." - Phrase is confusing and unencyclopedic. Please advise. --Plastictv 04:21, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
POV?[edit]
- With 800,000 people reading its print edition, and many millions more online, the paper is considered to be an objective, credible newspaper, enjoying a high reputation among the regional Chinese community.
As long as there is no survey data to back this statement up I think it should be deleted. The fact that it is read widely does not mean the newspaper is considered objective or credible. If that were the case, the German Bild-Zeitung would be the most credible German newspaper. --Ghormax 17:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
I would like to express the observation that in recent years, most commentaries published in the online version seem to take a pro-China stance. How can I suitably include such information in the article? Arkansaw 13:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Circulation[edit]
"a daily circulation of about 388,500 copies on weekdays and 388,500 copies on Sundays"... The number is the same, which could have been the intent in repeating it for Sundays too? Tylko (talk) 22:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lianhe Zaobao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110610013112/http://www.sphsubscription.com.sg:80/newspaper/ProductSynopsis/tabid/82/Default.aspx?pid=2 to http://www.sphsubscription.com.sg/newspaper/ProductSynopsis/tabid/82/Default.aspx?pid=2&item=LianheZaobao
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110417202000/http://www.sphsubscription.com.sg:80/newspaper/NewspaperSubscription/tabid/63/Default.aspx to http://www.sphsubscription.com.sg/newspaper/NewspaperSubscription/tabid/63/Default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)