User talk:Gaidheal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

no-one[edit]

ever comments here =( ^sad face of sorrow, facies doloris

gaidheal 02:55, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

apical ridge[edit]

I'm not sure what you mean by "apical ridge." In linguistics, apical refers to sounds produced with the tip of the tongue. Are you perhaps referring to the alveolar ridge? This is the fleashy ridge just behind the upper teeth and indeed other romantic languages do produce the r by flapping the alveolar ridge. Grika 01:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No prob...dude[edit]

Just wanted to make sure. Also, concerning the -ent thang, is the alternative that only the t is silent? Grika 16:48, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist carnation[edit]

right|70px Isn't that picture you uploaded a rose instead of a carnation? That doesn't look like a carnation, I'm Portuguese and I know very well what a carnation is - Carnation Revolution. We call the Portuguese Socialist Party "the Party of the Rose" because they used such symbol. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I really think that's a rose. Afonso Silva 23:45, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tây Bồi[edit]

Thanks for your outstanding work at Tây Bồi and Vietnamese French. Really superior. Just one question--what's the difference between Tây Bồi and Vietnamese French? The French who emigrated (permanently or temporarily) to VN would not have considered themselves--I'm pretty sure--to speak anything other than standard French of France...therefore the pidgin can be grouped as a separate language/dialect, but the French per se say spoken there is still French, with no qualification...anyway, thanks again for your help. And please don't be blue :) --Dpr 17:13, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could upload an image for this page? See the talk page of this article.

Canadianism 04:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've listed for deletion the "red carnation" (red rose?) image you've submitted, as I uploaded a much better SVG version (you can find it here). Let me know if you agree about it. --Angelo 02:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 22:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Nintai.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]