Talk:Lofoten

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In popular culture[edit]

Communication[edit]

Should someone change Communications to Transportation maybe? et forslag bare — Preceding unsigned comment added by XxDestinyxX (talk • contribs) 16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Climate Chart[edit]

Norwegian Meteorological Institute has now made more stations available in eklima climate data for free with average daily high and low. One of the longest recordings in Lofoten (recordings since May 1933) is from the small village of Skrova on a small island close to Svolvær. This is a climate chart for Skrova (base period 1961-90).

Skrova/Svolvær
Climate chart (explanation)
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
 
 
69
 
 
1
−2
 
 
53
 
 
1
−3
 
 
54
 
 
2
−2
 
 
47
 
 
4
1
 
 
39
 
 
9
4
 
 
42
 
 
13
8
 
 
57
 
 
15
11
 
 
60
 
 
15
11
 
 
86
 
 
11
8
 
 
117
 
 
7
4
 
 
87
 
 
4
1
 
 
91
 
 
2
−2
█ Average max. and min. temperatures in °C
█ Precipitation totals in mm
Source: met.no/klimastatistikk/eklima
Imperial conversion
JFMAMJJASOND
 
 
2.7
 
 
34
28
 
 
2.1
 
 
34
28
 
 
2.1
 
 
35
29
 
 
1.9
 
 
39
33
 
 
1.5
 
 
48
40
 
 
1.7
 
 
55
46
 
 
2.2
 
 
59
51
 
 
2.4
 
 
58
51
 
 
3.4
 
 
52
46
 
 
4.6
 
 
45
39
 
 
3.4
 
 
39
33
 
 
3.6
 
 
36
29
█ Average max. and min. temperatures in °F
█ Precipitation totals in inches

I suggest using this in article and removing some of the text in the climate section in article. Orcaborealis (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking, the article's interpretation of the 1961-90 data is wrong because it does not show it having a subpolar oceanic climate (Cfc) under the Köppen climate classification. It is surely more a subarctic continental (Dfc) climate, as the January and February average temperatures are a little below freezing. Admittedly, the climate for this station is on the borderline of being Cfc/Dfb/Cfb, so an updated data set could take it to any one of those places. But still, the current data set used in this article doesn't support the Cfc classification, it should be described as Dfc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.160.85 (talk) 02:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove this Talk Section?[edit]
I believe the climatological nuances are now moot. I've copied the Lofoten weatherbox from the Norsk page to the English page. I believe this talk section can be removed.
--Tuna Fish 5 (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have replaced a weather box with with official data from met.no with an unoffical web page which just says Lofoten (not even where in Lofoten)?? Also, Met.no has not released any avg highs/lows for 1991-2020 yet (unless done today) and that data is plainly wrong. Only the outher islands will have such a cool July, but then the winter will be warmer. 16:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Orcaborealis (talk) 16:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lofoten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Climate -- Deadliest Rainstorms[edit]

This section had the statement "Two of the top ten deadliest rainstorms ever recorded passed through Lofoten." This was linked to a since-removed table on another Wp page. I saw no remark about these storms—much less a reference for them—even on the Norwegian-language Lofoten page.

If any passing Norwegian climatophile or Norskophile climatologist can substantiate these historic events, they may restore the statement about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuna Fish 5 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology[edit]

The remarkable thing about Lofoten is that not only 'Lo' can be related to light via Old Norse 'lóa'. But also Foten can be related to light. The Greek word for light is φώτα (fóta). And that might be less farfetched as you might believe since Lofoten is one of the candidates for Thule, that was visited by the Greek Pytheas. referencing to light is also not farfetched as it may relate to Auroris Boreales, but also to the polardays and -nights. Anyway, remarkable enough to put this in here.Lz89z1 (talk) 12:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology[edit]

"Most parsimonious is the analogy with Aurora Borealis, as the word fótr is typically not used to describe the feet of beasts of prey, instead using the word hrammr (paw) or löpp (also paw) for animals such as cats or dogs."

Lynx are typically considered predators, not prey, which brings this entire statement into question 105.233.92.71 (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lofoten&oldid=1194457605"