Talk:Household

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just because the IRS changes their definition of what a taxable household is, doesn't mean the rest of the world follows. To state and restate that a household is not a synonym of family is false.

From Webster's 1913 dictionary: http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=Household

Household (Page: 709)

House"hold` (?), n.

1. Those who dwell under the same roof and compose a family.

--Connel MacKenzie 07:23, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

I don't think the "rest of the world" follows Webster's 1913 dictionary. Why don't we keep it simple and follow Wiktionary's definition and say that a household may or may not be a family? Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 06:15, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)

Expansion request[edit]

I would be interested in seeing a discussion of household size, and the demographics of how it has changed over time in various places. -- Beland 07:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Social and other dimensions to household[edit]

Obviously we have some work to do on this article.

Among many other things I think we need to flesh out the meaning of 'household' in social theory, and specify how 'household' relates to 'home', 'residence', 'abode', 'dwelling', 'family'.

SeventhHell (talk) 06:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hear hear! The opening line is indeed quite bleak and does not set the scene very well. The 2003 reference from an, I assume, generic textbook does not even reflect standard accepted definitions of household from the 1970s! (I'm thinking here of Jack Goody, who says that households may eat, sleep and work together, but not necessarily do all these things together at the same time or in the same place!). Furthermore research into diasporas and the notion of a global household has really changed ideas about what households are in social theory.

It is six years almost since seventh's post, so isn't it about time we updated this? 79.64.147.204 (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Query existence of Household Help![edit]

Has anyone heard of this so-called parody program Household Help!? (the very last section of the article). The article link for it showed as 'does not exist' so I removed it, I googled around and could find no such progam. Can anyone attest to the existence of such a program? I don't know what we do about that, I guess I will insert a [dubious – discuss] tag and see what happens. SeventhHell (talk) 12:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear family not the most common structure anymore[edit]

Per the sources in Nuclear family, nuclear family amounts to 24.1% of US households in 2000. So the statement "...especially in western societies where the nuclear family has become the most common family structure" is not true. At least not any longer and not in the United States. Actually the "Married without children" and "Single" categories are both higher than the "Nuclear" family category for the US, and together they appear to be slightly more, than twice the percentage of the "Nuclear" category. This change may, or may not, be true for other Western countries, but it needs to be clarified, or removed as misleading. I'm tagging that statement with {{fact}} for the time being. — Becksguy (talk) 21:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - Changed to {{dubious}} tag — Becksguy (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've looked up the edit history and asked Feco to check it out.SeventhHell (talk) 06:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i don't think "single" count as family. nor do i think childless couples doesn't count as 'Nuclear family'. Nuclear family is a term used in comparison with larger Extended family, and non of those are extended, they are still smaller. it might be reword to better fit the context, i don't think the way it discuss Nuclear family has much input on how it differ from household. 218.186.12.245 (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Economics[edit]

"Most economic theories assume there is only one income stream to a household[citation needed]; this a useful simplification for modeling, but does not necessarily reflect reality. Many households now include multiple income-earning members".

The whole article has a [citation needed] banner, but this particular claim stuck out so much that I thought it deserved one of its own. "Does not necessarily reflect reality" and "Many now include" are being generous - my understanding is that the "husband works, wife stays at home" division of labour is a historical anomaly (outside the upper and upper-middle classes). "Everyone works, including the children" seems to have been the commonest arrangement though most of history, quite apart from the modern tendancy for both partners to work. Do "most economic theories" really ignore that? Iapetus (talk) 15:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure we can definitively say what arrangement has been the most common throughout history, but I'd agree that it's phrased in an assumptive way. In fact the section is minimal, it's just a stub. I think it deserves a treatment of the full economic sense of the term. Not to mention most of the article needs serious clean up.— ʀoyoтϵ 00:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Household. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Household. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Household. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Household. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please translate the following topic.....[edit]

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/中华人民共和国户籍制度 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.181.242.199 (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • google's translation

https://translate.google.com.au/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-CN&u=https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hans/%25E4%25B8%25AD%25E5%258D%258E%25E4%25BA%25BA%25E6%25B0%2591%25E5%2585%25B1%25E5%2592%258C%25E5%259B%25BD%25E6%2588%25B7%25E7%25B1%258D%25E5%2588%25B6%25E5%25BA%25A6&prev=search

"Head of the household" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Head of the household. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Household&oldid=1211093321"