User talk:WTD

Welcome!

Hello, WTD, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

---

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
• If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
• Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
• You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
• You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
• If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:35, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

POV on Wikipedia

As you can see, a few people have reverted your addition to Wikipedia. This indicates that you should rethink whether it is a neutral statement, and whether your personal opinion is an appropriate thing to add to the first paragraph of the article. Please take a look at the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. In addition, continuing to revert the article would be a violation of the Wikipedia:Three revert rule and you could be temporarily blocked from editing. Hope this explains things. Please let me know if you have any questions. Rhobite 03:23, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

What you are now doing could be construed as disruption, also against the rules. Please don't add self-references to articles such as "see the history". I suggest you head to Talk:Wikipedia and propose your changes in a constructive manner. Rhobite 03:53, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Tony. You can respond here, it's better to keep discussions on a single talk page. Since the quote is from Jimbo Wales in a Slashdot interview, it's clear to me that it's rhetoric, but acceptable rhetoric. The quote isn't part of an official mission statement, although it appears to have gained "semi-official" status. My point is that it is not meant to be taken completely literally. It's meant to inspire, not to direct - it's a chicken in every pot. I don't think the quote needs a disclaimer. Rhobite 04:07, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Mel, forgive me (again) - are you and Rhobite one and the same person?

Mel and I are two entirely separate people. Honest! Rhobite 04:25, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

I've just discovered this (WTD, remember to sign your comments!). I'd already reaised the question on Talk:Wikipedia; as I'm still a bit unsure why WTD's additions were reverted, would it be possible to explain there (for my benefit as much as for his)? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:09, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)