Talk:New York Minute

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Chris Bennett (March 17, 2005). "Glad You Asked". The Journal Times Online.

Disambig[edit]

This looks like a prime candidate for a dismabig page. - 203.35.154.254 23:19, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. GTBacchus^(talk) 01:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New York minute → New York Minute — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The New York minute (time) article has been deleted, and all articles listed here have the first letter of "Time" capitalised in the title. snigbrook (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support sounds reasonable. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Clustering the "In a ..." versions first would be one of the great ideas of a really dumb bot ... well, never m,ind[edit]

--JerzyA (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Definition in page[edit]

I am reverting the change that removes the definition from the page because it's easily possible to not realize that "New York minute" has a definition at all if you're not already aware that it's an idiom.

WP:DABDIC explicitly states "A short description of the common general meaning of a word can be appropriate for helping the reader determine context", which I think is appropriate here. wfaulk (talk) 21:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]