Talk:Deewaar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion[edit]

I recieved a message from User talk:DMacks notifying me to review my edits, which was the addition of two images appearing in the plot section. I called you fellows because you three are presently the most active and experienced users for editing articles related to Hindi films.BollywoodDreamz , Shahid and Bollyjeff Please discuss and decide whether the images on this article should be deleted or kept. And why can't articles of Hindi films have screenshots. Many articles of Hollywood related films have screenshots, American Beauty even has a video. And please answer my questions, can't screenshots of Indian movies provide encyclopedic knowledge or aren't here enough administrators reviewing articles of Hollywood films. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bineetojha (talk • contribs) 13:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There has to be some good reason for having non-free pictures. They have to be supported by, and important to the text. In this case you could probably have Deewaar1 OR Deewaar2 and Deewaar3 together, but not all three. Also, the fair-use rationale on the picture files must specifically say why they are needed. To describe the difference between the brothers, etc. BollyJeff || talk 13:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Deewaar (1975 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Dab page moved to Deewaar (disambiguation). Jenks24 (talk) 07:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deewaar (1975 film) → Deewaar – On the basis of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, I feel the term "Deewaar" is way more identified with this film than the 2004 film and the unnotable TV series which is spelt without one "a". Kailash29792 (talk) 08:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 12:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not convinced the last time at WP:RM there was a discussion on two Indian films we ended up sending all readers to the one with less than 50% of views. Not quite that case this time. views. But is there still a significant benefit in potentially sending 161 readers a day to the wrong film? (of course that won't happen, that's the upper limit of what could theoretically happen). In ictu oculi (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: In terms of readership, the 1975 film easily triumphs over the 2004 film and the TV series. In fact, the majority of images in this Google Images search query relate to the 1975 film only. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in terms of page views and significance.--Cúchullain t/c 13:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Deewaar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Deewaar[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Deewaar's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "indianexpress":

  • From Rajesh Khanna: "PHOTOS: Fans remember Rajesh Khanna on his first death anniversary Photo Gallery, Picture News Gallery - The Indian Express". indianexpress.com. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  • From Gunga Jumna: "Hindi classics that defined the decade: 1960s Bollywood was frothy, perfectly in tune with the high spirits of the swinging times". The Indian Express. 31 October 2017.
  • From Dilip Kumar: http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/dilip-kumar-happy-birthday-turns-94-a-look-at-his-journey-india-first-method-actor-4420625/

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deewaar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

The film is officially a Hindi language production. Do refer the censor board certificate that appears before the opening credits.103.5.133.9 (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See my response at Talk:Salim-Javed. Maestro2016 (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deewaar&oldid=1200987035"