User talk:Neuro

user

talk

sandbox

wip

meta

blog

This is my talk page. Leave a new message for me, or use the [Edit] links to add to an existing message.

Archives: 2004: 2004-12-29

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision

Hey, you endorsed the RfC on Everyking, and you probably know it's gone to arbitration. Some of us feel that the proposed decision against Everyking is insufficient and too weak for a user who has abused Wikipedia so badly. I hope you can weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision having read the proposed decision and discussion and share your opinion with us, whether it's that the decision is too strong, just right, or too weak. Just because you weren't involved as deeply as some of us shouldn't prevent you from sharing your opinion. Johnleemk | Talk 06:17, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

About the Fiat Croma

You said: "why all the non-breaking space entities in Fiat Croma?"

In case of line breaks, the number will remain associated with the respective measurement unit in the same line. It's in the style guides. --Pc13 11:15, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mirror Clarification

I moved your "clarification" page to User:Neuropedia/Mirror Clarification from the Template: namespace (was at Template:User:Neuropedia:Mirror Clarification). You can keep it, or request its deletion, but I think we can agree it's not going to be a "General use" template. -- Netoholic @ 01:02, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC)

New Fiat Punto: the sources say joint GM/Fiat platform

You have updated the Fiat Punto article with information on the Mark 3, codeveloped by Fiat and Opel, but other GM-related articles like GM Gamma platform and Opel Corsa state that GM DAT is responsible for the next Corsa platform; I believe this was contributed by User:Sfoskett. I've found lot of links that confirm your information, but I can't find anything regarding GM DAT's responsibility of building new Corsa platform. Should we resolve this issue in Talk:GM_Gamma_platform or maybe somewhere else? --DmitryKo 23:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Duplicate Fiat Seicento

Even as it is, it's pictures and the rest of the data is al in the Fiat area, and formatted really well ... if's it's just part of a migration project fine, but as it stands it's a duplicate orphan. -- Dbroadwell 00:06, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I've been scouring the orphans relentlessly and am a bit happy go ~stomp~ at the moment. Since it really is part of a work in progress and not lost and forlorn, Great! -- Dbroadwell 02:58, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Battlestar Galactica Season one

Well.. i am wondering, if someone is yet bussy with writing a wikipage about the recently aired miniseries on Skyone in the uk (which is also available on DVD since the end of march) And as you edited a lot on the battlestar 2003 series, you might know :) (also i am not an english native speaker, so... you would get some buggy english in an article and we can't have that ofcourse) --Letatcest 10:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Button Menu

Hey, just wanted to let you know I modified and used User:Neuropedia/Buttons for the basis of my own User Page (now at http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:RossKoepke/Newpage - soon to be at http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:RossKoepke ). It still looks very similar to yours on the surface, but the code has been completely revamped. You might actually want to take a look at the code, it's much more browser-friendly to browsers like Opera and IE. --RossKoepke^Talk

CHU

See Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations#Neuropedia_.E2.86.92_Neuro — Rlevse • Talk • 02:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Username

Hi there! I am currently at editor review, and Townlake brought up a valid point, which is that for all of my time editing with this signature I had not checked whether this account existed and was active. Whilst my signature is easily distinguishable from yours, Townlake brought up a valid point about confusion. I'm not really sure what I'm saying here, I guess I just figured that I should note to you that I have been using this signature for a while now, which could ease any confusion that may occur if we get mistaken for one-another (although so far the coast would appear to be clear, judging by the lack of talk page messages). I am sort of attached to this signature, and would be highly reluctant to change it - that is the only reason I am not changing it, it has been my signature for a good while now, and people know me by it. Again, not entirely sure what I'm trying to convey with this message, just figured I shouldn't let it lie. Thanks, and here's hoping you're having a good day. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting. Not sure why you used a truncation of your username in your signature, but that's your call I guess! Perhaps reciprocal disclaimers on each other's User pages? (Neuro|Neurolysis) is not (Neurolysis|Neuro)? Or perhaps you can think of a better way (if needed) to distinguish each other?  :)

I'm happy to do that, and will do so now. :) (sorry I didn't reply earlier, seems I forgot to watchlist this) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 00:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorted :) —Neuro (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Lad culture/AfD

Thanks for the mindful, polite note about my edit to Lad culture. I removed the AfD tag, expanding on my reasons in the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnavarro (talk • contribs) 22:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Characters on The West Wing

Template:Characters on The West Wing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Toby Ziegler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toby Ziegler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Ziegler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 15:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lumison logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lumison logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lumison logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lumison logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neuro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neuro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)