Talk:Jungfrau Park

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello[edit]

Hello RickK !

Regarding the edits about "He went as far as grossly forge "proofs" (see Von Däniken" and " The overal impression is quite cheap [1]", I understand that the formulation is not appropriate... Do you think that there coud be alternative formulations which could save these ?

The part about Von Däniken might sound a little bit tendencious, but his claim to "educate" the population would probably be better presented with at least a lmited background on the fellow.

For the "cheap" part... I think you'd have to be there to judge -- it's hardly believable. I remember the badly adjusted projectors, the ridiculous flying saucer coming down from the ceiling "Ed Wood"-like, the lack of animations, ... I'm not even talking about the content of the message, but the mere means of commnication were really sub-standard compared to things like "Futuroscope" in Poitier. You se that there is even a press report which addresses this... (even in the context of "is expected to provide a boost for the stagnant local economy. The park has created 120 new jobs and the company expects to attract half a million people a year." -- now that say somehting). So again, do you think that a better formulation is possible ?

Thanks and cheers ! Rama 07:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Is it open now?[edit]

The official page link doesn't work for me, and I cannot find out. Does anyone know for sure? Kelisi 21:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To Alli_jayne321[edit]

The entry has some serious style problems that could be resolved with better copyediting.Hoopes (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]