Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divalent metals

Divalent metals was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 6 votes to delete. Postdlf 05:04, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Divalent metals

Original research, nonencyclopedic, obscure. Reads like scientific paper citation and abstract. It's about hemoglobin not just divalent metals. The place and even journal cited does not have such a paper(see [1]). Created by anon user, whose only other edit is under copyviol review, and is by same lead author in same journal. -R. S. Shaw 05:59, 2004 Oct 20 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a citation index. Original research. jni 07:30, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Title doesn't fit article, original research, just an abstract. No context. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 18:46, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Josh Cherry 02:16, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Patent nonsense (if not a Turing test attempt). Robinh 21:11, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with MGM. NeoJustin 23:54, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.