Talk:Hollywood Heartbreakers

From VfD

from VfD:

A porn film. Makes no mention of why its notable. There's something like a few hundred thousand (if not more) porn films out there. Do we need an article on every single one of them? [[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]] 07:10, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. The way the article currently stands, it does not establish notability. -- JamesTeterenko 07:54, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Surely it's notable for the unheard-of unembarrassingness of the title. Yes, I wouldn't mind being overheard asking in the video store for something called "Hollywood Heartbreakers". But that's feeble notability indeed. Delete -- Hoary 08:07, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)
• On BJAODN in the past. Samaritan 08:49, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • LOL! God bless America indeed. (SO glad I live in Canada) [[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]] 10:20, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Everyking 12:48, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup (the article, if you cleaned the movie there probably wouldn't be much footage left). Seems to be genuine, and has a couple of notable performers (sic) such as Traci Lords. Andrewa 16:59, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep Wyss 18:40, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 19:48, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. If someone wants to make a real article on this, let them do it, but if nobody does, nothing is lost. - Andre Engels 22:28, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • ...What about who starred in it, what year it was released, and the fact it's porn? I'd say that would be lost. Everyking 23:32, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Reluctantly Delete. While I haven't seen it personally, it has both Ron Jeremy and Peter North, possibly the two biggest (no pun intended) stars in American porn today. However, they're in separate scenes (according to the entry at IAFD), so this sounds like typical porn film that happens to have big-name talent. Googling it has found me nothing but similar stubs, with the release date, cast, and crew, so it seems unlikely that it's important to the history of pornography. --LostLeviathan 00:21, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: That's quite a lot of information, and most of it isn't in the current stub, so if it's kept please add it. No change of vote. Andrewa 14:26, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• keep Yuckfoo 04:52, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not IMDB. While there are some porn films that merit their own article, this doesn't sound like one of them -- Ferkelparade π 08:49, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Wikipedia is not IMDB, it is much more sophisticated and not the private property of Amazon.com. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 17:21, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable stars, minorly notable. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 20:40, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
• My personal feelings say delete. But my sense of what Wikipedia should be says keep. Wikipedia wins. Samaritan 01:20, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • What, a directory of porn films? Shall I make an article for...*scans Peter North's filmography* ..."First Time Ever 5" (What an oxymoron) "Gang Bang Girl 22"? Or, considering films with another porn star of some notability, "Harlequin Affair"? "Whore of the Worlds"? What I'm saying here is do we really need (and I'm not asking this on any kind of "moral" basis, rather a notability one) an entry for every single porn film ever made? Sure, notable ones, I can understand. Stuff that broke records, or a major star's first (or last) movie, or etc. But every Joe Average porn film? I don't think we really need that. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]] 02:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • This should really come as no surprise, but I think that'd be just dandy. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:24, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: pr0ncruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:45, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - David Gerard 23:05, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Tuf-Kat 03:49, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep for now and place on cleanup. Bryan 20:56, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion