Talk:Vishva Hindu Parishad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2022[edit]

Alam2346 (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Love jihad and religious conversation.what is written in this page is completely reverse from the fact truth.please remove it or correct it

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 00:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi serial Ahilya bai.[edit]

Tha way this serial is showing Martha's as highly foolish totally unable to identify traitors in home,allowing daily new traitors without any scrutiny,allowing Muslim women like Ramjani and showing Khande Rao in such a poor light looks disgraceful. Why such serial continues to be aired? 120.21.169.139 (talk) 00:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Crime & Terrorism Project[edit]

Hi @Vanamonde93: I had added crime and terrorism WP projects for Talk:Bajrang Dal and Talk:Vishva Hindu Parishad. But User:Capitals00 reverted my edits twice. I don't want to engage in an edit war. He is unable to give a proper explanation why he has reverted my edit. I said both articles are about a right-wing organisation where they are both involved in some form of crime and terror activities, and the majority of sources do state that. I am keen to add both of these WP projects; would you please comment on this issue? Especially VHP, who are mainly involved in the demolition of a mosque. Thanks 2405:201:800B:6079:D991:E0CE:8D8F:7B88 (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Capitals00: Please explain here why you reverted the edit. I have already pinged an admin on this issue. He's quite experienced regarding this matter.--2405:201:800B:6079:C553:808B:F864:4D51 (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They are not terrorist organization, neither they are criminals by occupation. That's why you should stop using irrelevant wikiprojects. Capitals00 (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But those organisations are clearly involved in criminal and terrorist activities, as the majority of sources state. And who said those were irrelevant projects? Those WP projects should be included in these two articles. @Doug Weller: can you please share your view on this matter.--2405:201:800B:6079:D8EA:37E4:7A62:E2D (talk) 06:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Capitals00: The VHP was clearly involved in the demolition of a mosque, and you're saying they're not criminals. Check the sources first; they clearly indicate that both of these organisations are definitely involved in criminal activities. It is quite clear to me that you won't go by what reliable sources state, but by your biassed opinion. Thanks--2405:201:800B:6079:D8EA:37E4:7A62:E2D (talk) 06:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. And stop personal attacks. Doug Weller talk 08:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
C'mon @Doug Weller: Please share your point of view properly. Should I add those two projects or not? @Rosguill: @Jayron32: @Bbb23: Guys, please share your opinion on this matter. @Doug, I won't make any personal attacks in the future. Thanks--2405:201:800B:6079:D8EA:37E4:7A62:E2D (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea why I have been pinged in this discussion. I have zero knowledge in this subject area, have no idea what it's about, and have nothing worthwhile to add beyond what those above have already said. --Jayron32 12:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto, although I suppose I can add my common-sense Wikipedian vote that unless/until criminal charges or terrorism are mentioned in the article, it is not appropriate to add these Wikiproject templates. signed, Rosguill talk 15:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I said they are not terrorist organization, neither they are criminals by occupation. Our wikipedia page does not say Demolition of Babri Masjid was a terrorist act. Capitals00 (talk) 13:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • We have very little formal guidance as to when specific wikiproject banners are to be used. If your intention is to describe the RSS and VHP as criminal or terrorist groups: that characterization isn't supported by sources, and this is the wrong way to go about it in any case. The argument could be made that the pages are of interest to a crime wikiproject, but even that's a bit of a stretch; do you really see people improving this article because of a general interest in crime? I think not. So I don't see the banners serving a purpose, and have no interest in pursuing this conversation further. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]