Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strike North

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 15:32, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Strike North

Sorry, but it made no sense to me. Also possibly original research. - Mailer Diablo 18:22, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Probably could be speedied as patent nonsense but as long as it's on VfD it might as well be discussed. Seems like a good example of "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make head or tail of it." This may be unfair since it may be the product of weak English language skills, but unless it can be clarified it must go. I think it is very likely that were it to be clarified it would turn out to be original research and quite possibly have POV problems. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:50, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ummm, original research? It certainly doesn't make any sense. DaveTheRed 02:37, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.I can not picture anyone discerning enough meaning to clean-up this article.Tjc 02:41, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 06:48, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Tothebarricades.tk 07:26, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.