Talk:Carbonite

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled[edit]

How can this be disambiguation page if it doesn't link anywhere?

It will when Carbonite_(explosive), or another article, is created.

How about a correct title? Lzer 05:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bold textCarbonite would not be an alloy made from frozen CO2, that is plain wrong. I think it should be deleted.

Polyatomic Ion[edit]

I thought carbonite was a polyatomic ion, symbol CO₂, with a charge of -2. Connör ^(talk) 15:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's also an online backup suite and the company that sells it.

Chrisfeohpatti (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a polyatomic ion. Also, it's symbol is CO₃, CO₂ is the chemical symbol for carbon dioxide. History Wizard (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore what I said earlier about the chemical symbol. It is CO₂, with -2 charge. History Wizard (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explosive[edit]

Carbonite the explosive is a mixture, and has no chemical formula (a physically impossible anion wouldn't work very well as an explosive anyway). I have restructured the page a bit to reflect this, removed the formula from that section, added information on the Carbonite brand of dynamite, and added a clarification for anyone who was really trying for carbonate but misspelled it (more common than you'd think).

But carbonite is also one of the polyatomic ions. I'll create a section in the article to reflect this. History Wizard (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "coal mining explosive"? I mean, what makes an explosive especially suitable for coal mines? Is it the rather incomplete combustion, leaving a lot of carbon monoxide, so that it is unlikely to start other dust or exposed coal burning? Colin McLarty (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Backup Service[edit]

Boffob - I believe this to be notable. Please explain if you feel it is not. - Operknockity (talk) 06:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek[edit]

There is a Star Trek episode "The Corbomite Maneuver". 217.151.192.51 (talk) 12:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]