User talk:PRB

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam [Spade] 11:42, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Michael Power[edit]

Hi, PRB. I just noticed that you had cut a bit from the Michael Power (Guinness character) article. The section was describing the film Critical Assignment and the fact that the crew and cast were mostly African. Can you explain why you cut this bit? According to my sources, that statement was true, but do you perhaps have access to something that shows it to be false? Thanks! --BrianSmithson 12:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dispute the factual content of the statement. The modified statement was

"Assignment is a typical action film, save that it was shot on location in Cameroon and Nigeria using African actors and crews."

Which I changed to:

Assignment, shot on location in Cameroon and Nigeria, is a typical action film

I altered this because:

It states earlier in the section that the Michael Power films "are also notable because the advertisements are shot on location in Africa using African actors and crews"
While it is true that the lion's share of action films are shot using principally American participants, to say that it a film is typical of its genre apart from the fact that it was made by Africans grates a little. The continent of residence of the participants doesn't in itself change the nature of the film, it is still just a "typical action film". What was there before was like saying "E=mc2 is a typical mathematical equation, save for the fact that it was originally written in America by a Jew.". If you mean to say that the use of purely African cast and crew brought with it some interesting cultural feature, then say so.PRB 16:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. The real significance is that, as you say, very few big-budget action films are made with African casts and crews. By calling the film "typical" I mean that the plot, characters, explosions, etc. are standard for the genre. I've had another go at it; please check it out when you get the chance. —BrianSmithson 17:05, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parts of a sail.png[edit]

Hello - Please provide source and copyright info for Image:Parts of a sail.png or it will be deleted in 7 days. Thanks! -SCEhard T 02:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How to make a page in a different language?[edit]

If I create a page in English, how can I transfer that page to another language. Do you have to go to the "other language" wikipedia and make the article completely new again or how does that work? I am fluent in other languages, but I don't know if there is a different way to go abot that or not? Can you write your respnse back on my page, thanks!Motorex (talk) 11:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AMSA[edit]

Thanks for your edits at AMSA WRT the shield/crest. I was just reading up on it and was about to make the corrections when you beat me to it. Thanks!--Cpt ricard (talk) 01:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry[edit]

I see you signed up at the WikiProject - I guess that means I'm not the newest member any more. <g>. Unfortunately, I don't see much happening there. Still... Welcome! David V Houston (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derek Roberts[edit]

The article Derek Roberts has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ϣere SpielChequers 01:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gregory Foster[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gregory Foster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mono (talk) 02:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-sa As reviewing administrator, I of course did not delete it,but added the necessary line of text to make it a stub article. I hope you'll be expanding it. I advise you to never leave an article with just a succession box or an infobox--someone is likely to try to delete it rather than do as they ought, and fix it. DGG ( talk ) 04:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IPA[edit]

Hi,

If you want to indicate local pronunciations, as at Cheshire, that's fine, but you need to mark them as local. When we indicate English pronunciations without any further clarification, they're just English, not any particular dialect. (And actually, is all of Cheshire non-rhotic?) — kwami (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For many words, you can't indicate pronunciations without any particular dialect. Both RP (i.e. Standard English) and most of the accents of North West of England are non-rhotic. Rhotic accents of English That's two reasons not to put the /r/ on the end. I'm moving this to the Cheshire Discussion page where it is more appropriate PRB (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you speak a non-rhotic accent, then you simply drop the ars. Problem solved. But not everyone in the world speaks a non-rhotic accent, in many place names the ars are not predictable, and WP-en is for all English speakers, not just non-rhotic speakers. Ergo we need to include the ars. Also, some non-rhotic accents have ars in this name. RP, for example. Okay, I know hardly anyone actually speaks RP any more, but it's still a prestige form. An argument that "some people in Cheshire have a rhotic accent, and RP has /r/ in this name, but we need to drop the /r/ because I don't have it in my dialect" doesn't hold water. You might want to read the IPA key you're linking to so that you know how this works. — kwami (talk) 08:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parts of a sail(Simplified).png missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Parts of a sail(Simplified).png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion[edit]

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, PRB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, PRB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, PRB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, PRB. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]