Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezequiel Santamaria

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ezequiel Santamaria[edit]

This was marked as a speedy delete, but isn't a speedy candidate. Using google I can find evidence that he has participated in some (what I assume is) mid-level tennis tournaments, but nothing that would make him notable. The article looks a bit like self promotion. Remember to look take wikipedia mirrors into account when searching. Thue | talk 08:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 10:12, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- reads like vanity. - Longhair | Talk 10:28, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Much is vanity wittering about his computer science studies, and tennis claims would require him to have competed for his country in the Davis Cup, competed in ATP Tour events, or at the very minimum have won Challenger level events to qualify as verifiably notable, I feel. I've found a site on the internet where they have been logging all the ATP rankings [1], and no Santamaria appears on the end of year rankings from 1997 onwards, so it would appear that he's never been in the top 1000 in the world. Average Earthman 11:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Aticle claim he is a well known tennis player from Argentina, but it's not even well known in Argentina. Irrelevant to the Wikipedia. --Marianocecowski 14:00, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.