User talk:Zapatancas/Archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello there Zapatero, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. — Miguel 18:26, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

ZP on ZP?[edit]

It is a little strange to have a user called Zapatero whose only purpose so far is to edit the article on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. You should (possibly humorously) dispel any doubts that you might actually be ZP or closely associated to him, in which case there might be some issues with Wikipedia's policy. — Miguel 18:26, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome Miguel!!! Don't worry about the name. I am always very neutral. ZP is not me.

It is good form to sign your contributions to talk pages. You can do so automatically by typing ~~~ or ~~~~ if you want a timestamp. The ~ can be inserted by clicking on the list of special characters under the edit box, incase your keyboard does not have it. — Miguel 10:58, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC)

Thank you. You are too polite. Zapatero 14:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) (from User talk:Zapatero, --SqueakBox 18:42, May 5, 2005 (UTC))

Hello there Zapatancas, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. — Miguel 18:26, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

Thank you again for your welcome but I am the old user Zapatero. I read that thing about not using famous names in the log in page, which I had overlooked when I registered for the first time. As I see you are a Wikipedia expert, do you think I should asked that username to be remove? Thank you. Zapatancas 13:55, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your edits[edit]

Why are you persistently vandalising my user page? Why are you reverting the hard work I have done at Zapatero? Why are you falsely accusing me of vandalism at the Pump? It strikes me you would rather follow the path of non-cooperation rather than engage in the hard work of dealing with any content dispute on the talk page. you should edit the material I have edited rather than just reverting back to your version, even when it has a clean up notice (foreign policy) and when I had actually cleaned up the article before redirecting it. Vandalism, edit warring and making false claims are not a substitute for hard work, --SqueakBox 16:20, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Your repeat vandalisms[edit]

You are certainly being reported for your inexcusable rudeness in vandalkising my user page yet again. Withdraw your lieas about me being SquealingPig, that was you in Madrid, or face the inevitable consequences of your lying, cheating and vandalising. You don't get any more second chances with me, --SqueakBox 14:43, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress#User:Zapatancas,
  • Vandalism of user pages (such as [1] and [2]) is a blockable offense, and is probably not the best way to go about dealing with a dispute. If you disagree with another editor, and genuinely want your voice heard, the most effective way to do it is to discuss it with other editors. Attacking them and vandalizing user pages will just get you blocked from editing. – ClockworkSoul 15:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Starting over[edit]

I haven't actually looked at the Zapatero article yet, and may not for a bit as I am busy and Solana gets my priority in the time I do have at Wikipedia, but I am very happy that everything is now back in one article, and therefore easy to keep a track on. I will justify any edits I make on the talk page. The best thing is for us both to keep a calm approach and debate the issues in a serious manner. While I like Zapatero I pride myself on doing my best to make NPOV articles (follow the link and read what wikipedia says on this subject if you haven't already done so) on all the politicians I write about (Central America too). We all find Wikipedia frustrating at times, but a calm, sticking strictly to the rules approach is the best way to get taken seriously round here. So let's try starting again. Que le vaya bien (as they say here), --SqueakBox 17:22, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Solicitud de participación[edit]

Supongo que dominas el español. Si no es así, traduciré este mensaje.

Soy un antiguo colaborador de la wikipedia hispana, que recientemente ha vuelto a hacerse habitual de la misma después de que algunos de sus administradores le censurarán información o artículos que no correspondían a la visión izquierdista de la realidad. He decidido enfrentarme a este monopolio ideológico y te escribo aquí para solicitar tu ayuda para que incorpores información al artículo de la hispana sobre Zapatero (así como a cualquier otro artículo).

Puedes contestarme en mi página de usuario en la wiki hispana (donde podrás leer un artículo sobre mi lucha contra la censura).

Gracias.


--Visitante 15:48, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Text added by SqueakBox insulting me[edit]

This insulting text was added by SqueakBox to harass and frighten me.

Troll[edit]

Fuck off Nazi scum, SqueakBox 17:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

SqueakBox abusing me again[edit]

SqueakBox added here on July 21 some offensive text he claims I wrote. That is completely false. I believe he vandalized his own page as another element within his strategy of continual harassment.

I have removed it but everybody can access the result of SqueakBox's brutality through the history of this talk page.

He also added the following text which gives a new significant example of his way of behaving with other users:Zapatancas 14:58, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zapatancas aka SquealingPig attacking SB as ever[edit]

The pig loves squeaking Z The pig loves squeaking Z Texts of Zapatancas insulting me: Texts of Zapatancas insulting me: http://www.koreus.com/modules/news/article1470.html Here you have a wonderful photograph of you] (It is a bunch of shit like you, pig). http://www.koreus.com/modules/news/article1470.html Here you have a wonderful photograph of you] (It is a bunch of shit like you, pig).

- A bunch of shit like you, pig + A bunch of shit like you, pig - + - I hate SqueakBox. He is an ugly, fat, monkey-like monster. We must destroy him before he destroys us! + - + - And let me tell you a thing. Your wife (or I'd say your 'transvestite boyfriend') thinks you are an ugly, fat gorilla and that's the reason why you have to practise sexual intercourse with animals. She also regrets to be wasting her life with you. + - + - And let me tell you a thing. Your wife (or I'd say your 'transvestite boyfriend') think you are an ugly, fat gorilla and that is the reason why you have to practise sexual intercourse with animals. She also regrets to be wasting her life with you. + Besides, your dog died because you broke 'its ass'. Never again be so nasty!!! It was a dog (stinking' at that by the way) but it had feelings. + - + - And let me tell you a thing. Your wife (or I'd say your 'transvestite boyfriend') thinks you are an ugly, fat gorilla and that's the reason why you have to practise sexual intercourse with animals. She also regrets to be wasting her life with you. + - + - :All by Zapatancas as SquealingPig. I think it is obvious who has problems. It is Zapatancas who uses terror tactics on those he does not like. He is cruel and heartless and should leave me alone instead of harrassing me. What he is doing is called trolling, ie attacking someone viciously, then when he gets a tiny reaction playing the victim as if he never attacked in the first place, SqueakBox 18:22, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

All by Zapatancas as SquealingPig. I think it is obvious who has problems. It is Zapatancas who uses terror tactics on those he does not like. He is cruel and heartless and should leave me alone instead of harrassing me. What he is doing is called trolling, ie attacking someone viciously, then when he gets a tiny reaction playing the victim as if he never attacked in the first place, SqueakBox 18:22, July 21, 2005 (UTC)


If you deny you are SquealingPig you are a liar, un mentiroso. Stop using wikipedia as a platform to attack me and take responsibilty for your actions as SquealingPig, who appeared minutes after you engaged me in an edit war, SqueakBox 15:36, July 26, 2005 (UTC)


Take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Zapatancas. I will not tolerate your abuse any longer SquealingPig, SqueakBox 15:42, July 26, 2005 (UTC)


Your user page[edit]

Your user page is not a platform to launch personal and unfounded attacks against another user, and so I have removed it. I strongly suggest you do not put it up again. If you have a problem with my behaviour address it through the appropriate channels, though I would remind you that diffs will show that it is you who has engaged me in the most vicious personal attacks since the beginning, SqueakBox 15:52, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

I have had to remove again the unpleasent comments SqueakBox likes writing (he is probably the author). Zapatancas 16:49, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank other user's comments from your user page SquealingPig. You know fully well these comments were yours and not mine. Ya basta ser culero, SqueakBox 17:30, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Mediation[edit]

Cómo vamos a arreglar todo esto? Esqueak ya esta parando cachorros. Me doy cuenta de que la vida es demasiado corta por tener problemas estupidos como tenemos. Hay solución entre nosotros? Yo solo quiero terminar esto, SqueakBox 18:09, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, there is a way to solve this. Show me a little more of respect. And also show respect (that is, don't delete) the edits made relating to Zapatero which report objective data or describe fairly existing theories about the subject (that is, that are NPOV). Zapatancas

If you apologise for the SquealingPig episode and don't attack me on your user page or elsewhere I am happy to let you be on the Zapatero article, by which I mean I would remove it from my watchlist, SqueakBox 18:23, July 26, 2005 (UTC)18:14, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]