Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Side issue/Archive1

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki to Wiktionary moink 17:19, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Side issue[edit]

Unsourced nonsense added by an environmentalist, User:Vince, who over a year ago started injecting POV into articles such as Paper, and also created the article Vested interests.

Delete or at least neutralize. --brian0918  17:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Basically a dicdef. Transwiki to Wiktionary. Martg76 18:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Transwiki to Wiktionary. Now that the POV has been neutralized, it is a dicdef.Tobycat 03:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Don't bother to transwiki. It's a phrase self-evident from the definitions of the two words. Rossami (talk) 23:17, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.